These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394448)

  • 1. Commentary on the application of (Q)SAR to the toxicological evaluation of existing chemicals.
    Pölloth C; Mangelsdorf I
    Chemosphere; 1997 Dec; 35(11):2525-42. PubMed ID: 9394448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. (Q)SARs: gatekeepers against risk on chemicals?
    Hulzebos EM; Posthumus R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):285-316. PubMed ID: 14506871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing.
    Kroes R; Galli C; Munro I; Schilter B; Tran L; Walker R; Würtzen G
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2000; 38(2-3):255-312. PubMed ID: 10717364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An overview of structure-activity relationships as an alternative to testing in animals for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, dermal and eye irritation, and acute oral toxicity.
    Enslein K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1988 Dec; 4(4):479-98. PubMed ID: 3188045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity.
    Benigni R
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Mar; 23(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15149144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SAR genotoxicity and tumorigenicity predictions for 2-MI and 4-MI using multiple SAR software.
    Krishna KA; Goel S; Krishna G
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2014 May; 24(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 24401039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay: in silico methods, and the in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity assays.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O; Giuliani A
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 6(7):809-19. PubMed ID: 20438313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemical diversity approach for evaluating mechanistic relatedness among toxicological phenomena.
    Pollack N; Cunningham AR; Klopman G; Rosenkranz HS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999 Dec; 10(6):533-43. PubMed ID: 10674291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of phototransformation products of thalidomide and mixture toxicity assessment: an experimental and quantitative structural activity relationships (QSAR) approach.
    Mahmoud WM; Toolaram AP; Menz J; Leder C; Schneider M; Kümmerer K
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():11-22. PubMed ID: 24316178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of in silico models for prioritization of heat-induced food contaminants in mutagenicity and carcinogenicity testing.
    Frenzel F; Buhrke T; Wenzel I; Andrack J; Hielscher J; Lampen A
    Arch Toxicol; 2017 Sep; 91(9):3157-3174. PubMed ID: 28091709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. (Q)SAR Methods for Predicting Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity: Scientific Rationale and Regulatory Frameworks.
    Bossa C; Benigni R; Tcheremenskaia O; Battistelli CL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():447-473. PubMed ID: 29934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted methods in chemical toxicity prediction.
    Mohan CG; Gandhi T; Garg D; Shinde R
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2007 May; 7(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 17504185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of non-commercial models for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in the assessment of EFSA's databases.
    Carnesecchi E; Raitano G; Gamba A; Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 31766891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicity of aliphatic amines: structure-activity relationship.
    Greim H; Bury D; Klimisch HJ; Oeben-Negele M; Ziegler-Skylakakis K
    Chemosphere; 1998 Jan; 36(2):271-95. PubMed ID: 9569935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of QSAR and in vitro toxicology.
    Barratt MD
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):459-65. PubMed ID: 9599692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, developmental toxicity, and skin sensitisation with Caesar program for a set of conazoles.
    Bolčič-Tavčar M; Vračko M
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2012 Sep; 63(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23152378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thresholds as a unifying theme in regulatory toxicology.
    Cheeseman MA
    Food Addit Contam; 2005 Oct; 22(10):900-6. PubMed ID: 16227175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.