These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394632)

  • 1. Multiaccommodative stimuli in VR systems: problems & solutions.
    Marran L; Schor C
    Hum Factors; 1997 Sep; 39(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 9394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lens induced aniso-accommodation.
    Marran L; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 1998 Nov; 38(22):3601-19. PubMed ID: 9893793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The short-term accommodation response to aniso-accommodative stimuli in isometropia.
    Vincent SJ; Collins MJ; Read SA; Ghosh A; Chen C; Lam A; Sahota S; Vo R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):552-61. PubMed ID: 26094940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.
    Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D
    Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel prototype for an optical see-through head-mounted display with addressable focus cues.
    Liu S; Hua H; Cheng D
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 20224134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic.
    Langenbucher A; Reese S; Jakob C; Seitz B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15315660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence.
    Rushton SK; Riddell PM
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Feb; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 10098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FocusAR: Auto-focus Augmented Reality Eyeglasses for both Real World and Virtual Imagery.
    Chakravarthula P; Dunn D; Aksit K; Fuchs H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Nov; 24(11):2906-2916. PubMed ID: 30207958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Normal accommodative convergence excess--long-term follow-up of conservative therapy with bifocal eyeglasses].
    Eckstein AK; Fischer M; Esser J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 9644668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The advantages and disadvantages of bifocal lenses].
    Zanen A
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 264():71-8. PubMed ID: 9490160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Radhakrishnan H; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 88(11):1309-16. PubMed ID: 21926653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual Limits of Optical See-Through Visors for Augmented Reality Guidance of Manual Tasks.
    Condino S; Carbone M; Piazza R; Ferrari M; Ferrari V
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 67(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 31059421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accommodation and size-constancy of virtual objects.
    Kenyon RV; Phenany M; Sandin D; Defanti T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 36(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 18066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field.
    Ellis SR; Menges BM
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):415-31. PubMed ID: 11536894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of accommodative insufficiency with plus lens reading addition: is +1.00 D better than +2.00 D?
    Wahlberg M; Abdi S; Brautaset R
    Strabismus; 2010 Jun; 18(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 20521882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When virtual and real worlds coexist: Visualization and visual system affect spatial performance in augmented reality.
    Pladere T; Luguzis A; Zabels R; Smukulis R; Barkovska V; Krauze L; Konosonoka V; Svede A; Krumina G
    J Vis; 2021 Aug; 21(8):17. PubMed ID: 34388233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accommodative element in accommodative esotropia.
    Somer D; Cinar FG; Duman S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 16546108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal dioptric value of near addition lenses intended to slow myopic progression.
    Jiang BC; Bussa S; Tea YC; Seger K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1100-5. PubMed ID: 18981925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response.
    Rosenfield M; Carrel MF
    Optometry; 2001 Jan; 72(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11217002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.