These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394659)

  • 21. Radiographic reporting directly from the TV monitor of a digital chest radiography system.
    Kheddache S; Tylén U; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 1889435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
    Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations.
    Persliden J; Helmrot E; Hjort P; Resjö M
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):638-44. PubMed ID: 14634780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Colonic contrast enema in digital luminescent radiography (DLR) and conventional x-ray technic].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Lorenz R; Glathe S; Dietlein M; Schirrmeister J
    Rofo; 1990 Feb; 152(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 2155442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
    Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors.
    Martin CJ; Hunter S
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1196-205. PubMed ID: 7874418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques.
    Chawla S; Levine MS; Laufer I; Gingold EL; Kelly TJ; Langlotz CP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10227502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of film-screen combination and digital fluorography in gastrointestinal barium examinations in a clinical setting.
    Barkhof F; David E; de Geest F
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 22(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 8832239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Edge enhancement algorithm for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopic imaging.
    Lee MS; Park CH; Kang MG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():45-52. PubMed ID: 29054260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
    Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The image intensifier in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
    Gans BJ; Kallal RH; Helgerson AC; Verona SR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1982 Nov; 40(11):726-9. PubMed ID: 6957560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiation dose reduction with frame rate conversion in X-ray fluoroscopic imaging systems with flat panel detector: basic study and clinical retrospective analysis.
    Sakai N; Tabei K; Sato J; Imae T; Suzuki Y; Takenaka S; Yano K; Abe O
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):985-992. PubMed ID: 29987416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Digital radiography und fluoroscopy. Basics of technology, imaging properties and applications].
    Loose R; Busch HP; Wucherer M
    Radiologe; 2005 Aug; 45(8):743-54; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 16079969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
    Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Paediatric dose reduction with the introduction of digital fluorography.
    Mooney RB; McKinstry J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.