These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394659)

  • 41. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Novel X-Ray Imaging Technology Allows Substantial Patient Radiation Reduction without Image Quality Impairment in Repetitive Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Wen X; Jiang X; Li R; Zhang J; Yang P; Shen B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1361-7. PubMed ID: 26472122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Initial experiences with pulsed fluoroscopy on a multifunctional fluoroscopic unit].
    Herrmann K; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Schätzl M; Allmendinger H; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 8998321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Digital image intensifier radiography: imaging qualities and initial use in the gastrointestinal area].
    Busch HP; Strauss LG; Prager P; Georgi M
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Jun; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 3524964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comparison of analog and digital fluoroscopy devices regarding patient radiation exposure in enteroclysis].
    Maataoui A; Reusch E; Khan MF; Gurung J; Thalhammer A; Ackermann H; Mulert-Ernst R; Vogl TJ; Jacobi V
    Rofo; 2008 Mar; 180(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 18278732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optimisation of dose per image in digital imaging.
    Marshall NW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):83-7. PubMed ID: 11487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Implementation of region-of-interest fluoroscopy by using the road mapping mode of a real-time digital radiographic unit.
    Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Guterman LR; Hopkins LN; Wakhloo AK; Fletcher LM; Massoumzadeh P
    Radiographics; 1995 Nov; 15(6):1465-70. PubMed ID: 8577969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Reduction of radiation exposure and image quality using dose reduction tool on computed tomography fluoroscopy].
    Sakabe D; Funama Y; Murazaki H; Tochihara S; Ono M; Tokuda M; Kai N; Nakato K; Hashida M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(8):970-8. PubMed ID: 22975695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Patient doses for barium meal examination in Serbia and Montenegro and potentials for dose reduction through changes in equipment settings.
    Ciraj O; Markovic S; Kosutic D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15933099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Organ and effective doses in infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic examination.
    Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 17388188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Indications for digital fluorography and storage-phosphor plates in pediatrics: certainties and questionable points.
    Durand C; Baudain P; Francois P; Kandelman M
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):89-91. PubMed ID: 7734549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Radiation exposure during digital hysterosalpingography: how much is due to fluoroscopy?].
    Merkle E; Vogel J; Aschoff AJ
    Rofo; 1995 Sep; 163(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 7548874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital luminescence radiography and conventional radiography in abdominal contrast examinations.
    Krug B; Harnischmacher U; Krahe T; Fischbach R; Altenburg A; Krings F
    Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 7742124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Koutelou M; Vano E; Neofotistou V
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 77(919):562-7. PubMed ID: 15238402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical aspects of quality criteria in digital radiography.
    Vetter S; Strecker EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11487839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.