These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9396895)

  • 1. A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Gottschall DS; Borgida AF; Mihalek JJ; Sauer F; Rodis JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 177(5):1067-70. PubMed ID: 9396895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Jones MM; Rahall A; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.
    Fletcher HM; Mitchell S; Simeon D; Frederick J; Brown D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):641-4. PubMed ID: 8369246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 intravaginal gel versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening before induction of labor.
    Pollnow DM; Broekhuizen FF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 174(6):1910-3; discussion 1913-6. PubMed ID: 8678158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical ripening before induction of labor: a randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel versus low-dose oxytocin.
    Jackson GM; Sharp HT; Varner MW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1092-6. PubMed ID: 7943077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Ottinger WS; Menard MK; Brost BC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 9731837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double-blind comparison of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and "chip" for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Smith CV; Rayburn WF; Connor RE; Fredstrom GR; Phillips CB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):845-7. PubMed ID: 2206072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized prospective comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
    Stempel JE; Prins RP; Dean S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1305-9; discussion 1309-12. PubMed ID: 9215189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a critical analysis.
    Rayburn WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 160(3):529-34. PubMed ID: 2648830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-blind comparison of 2.5 and 5.0 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Smith CV; Miller A; Livezey GT
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 8913976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.