These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9397492)

  • 21. Evaluation of a smartphone-based colorimetric method for urinalysis dipstick readings in cats.
    Leynaud V; Gillet C; Lavoué R; Concordet D; Reynolds BS
    J Feline Med Surg; 2023 May; 25(5):1098612X231171434. PubMed ID: 37226706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analytical verification of 12 most commonly used urine dipsticks in Croatia: comparability, repeatability and accuracy.
    Vuljanić D; Dojder A; Špoljarić V; Saračević A; Dukić L; Leniček-Krleža J; Vlašić-Tanasković J; Maradin I; Grzunov A; Vogrinc Ž; Šimundić AM
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Feb; 29(1):010708. PubMed ID: 30799977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative urinalysis with a common predilution on a DuPont Dimension.
    Engel H; Priem-Visser D; Lindemans J; Blijenberg BG
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1994 Oct; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 7865619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100).
    Fenili D; Pirovano B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 36(12):909-17. PubMed ID: 9915222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Examination of urine in the office].
    Hofstetter A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Jul; 147(29-30):45-7. PubMed ID: 16116849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The second biennial of the External Quality Evaluation Program in Urinalysis (PEECU)].
    Loría A; Mejía M; Granados L; Hernández E
    Rev Invest Clin; 2002; 54(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 12183892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of semi-quantitative methods for protein and sugar estimation in urine.
    Chaturvedi S; Jain N; Bhatia A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 44(4):399-401. PubMed ID: 12035348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.
    Shayanfar N; Tobler U; von Eckardstein A; Bestmann L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stability of common analytes in urine refrigerated for 24 h before automated analysis by test strips.
    Froom P; Bieganiec B; Ehrenrich Z; Barak M
    Clin Chem; 2000 Sep; 46(9):1384-6. PubMed ID: 10973869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the reproducibility and accuracy of pH-determining devices used to measure urine pH in dogs.
    Johnson KY; Lulich JP; Osborne CA
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Feb; 230(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 17269867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laboratory-based quality assurance programme for near-patient urine dipstick testing, 1990-1997: development, management and results.
    Tighe P
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1999; 56(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 10492909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer.
    Ben-Ezra J; Bork L; McPherson RA
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jan; 44(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 9550564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative evaluation of urinalysis test strips.
    Penders J; Fiers T; Delanghe JR
    Clin Chem; 2002 Dec; 48(12):2236-41. PubMed ID: 12446482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of a reagent strip device for quantitation of the urine albumin: creatinine ratio in a point of care setting.
    Parsons M; Newman DJ; Pugia M; Newall RG; Price CP
    Clin Nephrol; 1999 Apr; 51(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 10230554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliable laboratory urinalysis results using a new standardised urine collection device.
    Roelofs-Thijssen MA; Schreuder MF; Hogeveen M; van Herwaarden AE
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Sep; 46(13-14):1252-6. PubMed ID: 23628593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the iChem® Velocity™ urine chemistry analyzer in a hospital routine laboratory.
    Hoffmann P; Hoffmann C; Ziebig R; Zimmermann M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Mar; 49(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 21288168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX - a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser.
    Zaman Z; Fogazzi GB; Garigali G; Croci MD; Bayer G; Kránicz T
    Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Feb; 411(3-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 19861122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Urine particles analysis: performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination.
    Jiang T; Chen P; Ouyang J; Zhang S; Cai D
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2011 Feb; 71(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can a non-invasive urine-based test become the next-generation diagnostic tool for malaria?
    Pradhan N; Hazra RK
    Infez Med; 2018 Sep; 26(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 30246761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality control in urinalysis.
    Takubo T; Tatsumi N
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():136-48. PubMed ID: 10926274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.