These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9398369)

  • 1. Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors.
    Gese EM; Ruff RL
    Anim Behav; 1997 Nov; 54(5):1155-66. PubMed ID: 9398369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serological survey for diseases in free-ranging coyotes (Canis latrans) in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.
    Gese EM; Schultz RD; Johnson MR; Williams ES; Crabtree RL; Ruff RL
    J Wildl Dis; 1997 Jan; 33(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9027690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
    Berger KM; Gese EM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1075-85. PubMed ID: 17922704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Olfactory attractants and parity affect prenatal androgens and territoriality of coyote breeding pairs.
    Schell CJ; Young JK; Lonsdorf EV; Mateo JM; Santymire RM
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():43-54. PubMed ID: 27378509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ungulate predation and ecological roles of wolves and coyotes in eastern North America.
    Benson JF; Loveless KM; Rutledge LY; Patterson BR
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):718-733. PubMed ID: 28064464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: I. The maintenance of borders between male oribi.
    Brashares JS; Arcese P
    Anim Behav; 1999 Jan; 57(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10053066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Home range formation in wolves due to scent marking.
    Briscoe BK; Lewis MA; Parrish SE
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Mar; 64(2):261-84. PubMed ID: 11926117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nutritional effects on reproductive performance of captive adult female coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Gese EM; Roberts BM; Knowlton FF
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Feb; 165():69-75. PubMed ID: 26763531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Hinton JW; van Manen FT; Chamberlain MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132203. PubMed ID: 26148130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Land cover and space use influence coyote carnivory: evidence from stable-isotope analysis.
    Webster SC; Hinton JW; Chamberlain MJ; Murphy JJ; Beasley JC
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17457. PubMed ID: 38854793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scent-marking behaviour and social dynamics in a wild population of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx.
    Vogt K; Zimmermann F; Kölliker M; Breitenmoser U
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():98-106. PubMed ID: 24814909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (
    Hinton JW; Gittleman JL; van Manen FT; Chamberlain MJ
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Apr; 8(8):3927-3940. PubMed ID: 29721269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-specific territoriality in a Canis hybrid zone: spatial segregation between wolves, coyotes, and hybrids.
    Benson JF; Patterson BR
    Oecologia; 2013 Dec; 173(4):1539-50. PubMed ID: 23864253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Territorial scent-marking effects on vigilance behavior, space use, and stress in female Columbian ground squirrels.
    Roth JD; Dobson FS; Neuhaus P; Abebe A; Barra T; Boonstra R; Edwards PD; Gonzalez MA; Hammer TL; Harscouet E; McCaw LK; Mann M; Palme R; Tissier M; Uhlrich P; Saraux C; Viblanc VA
    Horm Behav; 2022 Mar; 139():105111. PubMed ID: 35063725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can a traditional partner preference test quantify monogamous behavior in captive coyotes?
    Turano A; Brummer SP; Young JK; Freeman SM
    Behav Processes; 2023 Mar; 206():104832. PubMed ID: 36693577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fine-scale movements and behaviors of coyotes (
    Chamberlain MJ; Cohen BS; Wightman PH; Rushton E; Hinton JW
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jul; 11(14):9575-9588. PubMed ID: 34306644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn.
    Berger KM; Gese EM; Berger J
    Ecology; 2008 Mar; 89(3):818-28. PubMed ID: 18459344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resident and transient coyotes exhibit differential patterns of movement behavior across heterogeneous landscapes in the southeastern United States.
    Webster SC; Beasley JC; Hinton JW; Chamberlain MJ
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e8725. PubMed ID: 35356555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces.
    Brashares JS; Arcese P
    Anim Behav; 1999 Jan; 57(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 10053067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision.
    Sacks BN; Mitchell BR; Williams CL; Ernest HB
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(4):1241-9. PubMed ID: 15773950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.