BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9398395)

  • 1. Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory.
    McNamara TP; Diwadkar VA
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Nov; 34(2):160-90. PubMed ID: 9398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies of the cognitive representation of spatial relations: II. A familiar environment.
    Baird JC; Merrill AA; Tannenbaum J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 528900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial memory of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) for hidden objects in a detour task.
    Fiset S; Beaulieu C; LeBlanc V; Dubé L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 17924796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measures of spatial memory and routes of learning.
    Wender KF; Wagener-Wender M; Rothkegel R
    Psychol Res; 1997; 59(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 9084236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information.
    Evans GW; Pezdek K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jan; 6(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 7373242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning fine-grained and category information in navigable real-world space.
    Uttal DH; Friedman A; Hand LL; Warren C
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1026-40. PubMed ID: 21156867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing symbolic capacity one step at a time.
    Huttenlocher J; Vasilyeva M; Newcombe N; Duffy S
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17280658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systems of spatial reference in human memory.
    Shelton AL; McNamara TP
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Dec; 43(4):274-310. PubMed ID: 11741344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases.
    Motes MA; Hubbard TL; Courtney JR; Rypma B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18763892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration, distance, and speed judgments of two moving objects by 4- to 11-year olds.
    Matsuda F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):286-311. PubMed ID: 8923748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Recall errors in locating cities on a map].
    Pohl R; Eisenhauer M
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(1):63-93. PubMed ID: 8646610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: a study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances.
    Denis M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 17658445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes.
    Cattaneo Z; Vecchi T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 18444761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adoption of an internal viewpoint following presentations of plan-view diagrams and maps.
    Drummond A; Tlauka M
    Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):243-57. PubMed ID: 19460237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.