BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9399185)

  • 1. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasma-treated woven polyethylene fiber.
    Samadzadeh A; Kugel G; Hurley E; Aboushala A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 9399185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique.
    Peñate L; Basilio J; Roig M; Mercadé M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 25935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of fiber reinforcement on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins.
    Hamza TA; Rosenstiel SF; Elhosary MM; Ibraheem RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 91(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 15060496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different reinforcements on the fracture toughness of materials for interim restorations.
    Geerts GA; Overturf JH; Oberholzer TG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):461-7. PubMed ID: 18514668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of fiber-reinforced surface-retained anterior cantilever restorations.
    Ozcan M; Kumbuloglu O; User A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 18548961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers.
    Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 10050121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations.
    Alt V; Hannig M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 21176946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro resistance of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures.
    Pfeiffer P; Grube L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 12616237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monomer priming of denture teeth and its effects on the bond strength of composite resin.
    Perea L; Matinlinna JP; Tolvanen M; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 24787127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel technique for the direct fabrication of fixed interim restorations.
    Konstantinidis I; Kotsakis G; Pallis K; Walter MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 23522370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties of a light-polymerizing provisional restorative material with and without reinforcement fibers.
    Dixon DL; Fincher M; Breeding LC; Mueninghoff LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jun; 73(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 11791260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load bearing capacity of fiber-reinforced and unreinforced composite resin CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed dental prostheses.
    Başaran EG; Ayna E; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 23395334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of two methods of reinforcement on the fracture strength of interim fixed partial dentures.
    Fahmy NZ; Sharawi A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 19432757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced PMMA interim fixed partial dentures.
    Hamza TA; Rosenstiel SF; El-Hosary MM; Ibraheem RM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 16827734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of two different fiber reinforcements on the fracture toughness of provisional restorative resins.
    Kamble VD; Parkhedkar RD
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 22945699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of postpolymerization conditioning and storage environments to the mechanical properties of three interim restorative materials.
    Thompson GA; Luo Q
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):638-48. PubMed ID: 24831742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of fiber reinforcement type and water storage on strength properties of a provisional fixed partial denture resin.
    Uzun G; Keyf F
    J Biomater Appl; 2003 Apr; 17(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 12797420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure modes with point loading of three commercially available denture teeth.
    Moffitt AR; Woody RD; Parel SM; Miller BH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 18482363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of carbon-epoxy frameworks for reinforcing provisional fixed partial dentures.
    Baldissara P; Katsinas G; Scotti R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 14739900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mechanical property analysis of polyethylene fiber reinforced polymethyl methacylate].
    Wang ZG; Mo SX; Ji YL; Zhang QX; Song ZC
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 22(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 15017706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.