These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9399559)

  • 1. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by nucleic acid tests: comparison with culture and enzyme immunoassay of genital swab specimens.
    Schepetiuk S; Kok T; Martin L; Waddell R; Higgins G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3355-7. PubMed ID: 9399559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.
    Carroll KC; Aldeen WE; Morrison M; Anderson R; Lee D; Mottice S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1630-3. PubMed ID: 9620391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.
    Bassiri M; Hu HY; Domeika MA; Burczak J; Svensson LO; Lee HH; Mårdh PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):898-900. PubMed ID: 7790456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.
    Quinn TC; Welsh L; Lentz A; Crotchfelt K; Zenilman J; Newhall J; Gaydos C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.
    van Doornum GJ; Buimer M; Prins M; Henquet CJ; Coutinho RA; Plier PK; Tomazic-Allen S; Hu H; Lee H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Aug; 33(8):2042-7. PubMed ID: 7559945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men and women by PCR assay.
    Toye B; Peeling RW; Jessamine P; Claman P; Gemmill I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1396-400. PubMed ID: 8735087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.
    Van Dyck E; Ieven M; Pattyn S; Van Damme L; Laga M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1751-6. PubMed ID: 11325985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RNA amplification by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with an internal standard enables reliable detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scrapings and urine samples.
    Morré SA; Sillekens P; Jacobs MV; van Aarle P; de Blok S; van Gemen B; Walboomers JM; Meijer CJ; van den Brule AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Dec; 34(12):3108-14. PubMed ID: 8940456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis.
    Deguchi T; Yasuda M; Uno M; Tada K; Iwata H; Komeda H; Maeda S; Latila V; Saito I; Kawada Y
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1708-10. PubMed ID: 8784574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Jaschek G; Gaydos CA; Welsh LE; Quinn TC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 May; 31(5):1209-12. PubMed ID: 8501220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.
    Ferrero DV; Meyers HN; Schultz DE; Willis SA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3230-3. PubMed ID: 9774570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of ligase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction on urine specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Singapore.
    Tan HH; Chan RK; Teo AS; Boey LP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1999 Mar; 28(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 10497676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Gen-Probe Chlamydia trachomatis transcription-mediated amplification assay with urine specimens from women.
    Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Miettinen A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Mar; 35(3):676-8. PubMed ID: 9041411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard.
    Black CM; Marrazzo J; Johnson RE; Hook EW; Jones RB; Green TA; Schachter J; Stamm WE; Bolan G; St Louis ME; Martin DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Oct; 40(10):3757-63. PubMed ID: 12354877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.
    Sugunendran H; Birley HD; Mallinson H; Abbott M; Tong CY
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: evaluation of a urine sample tested by enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in comparison with a cervical and/or a urethral swab tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction.
    Jensen IP; Fogh H; Prag J
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Mar; 9(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 12667251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
    Ostergaard L; Møller JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.
    Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Pitkäjärvi T; Koskela M; Miettinen A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 35(2):402-5. PubMed ID: 9003605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.
    Land S; Tabrizi S; Gust A; Johnson E; Garland S; Dax EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2893-6. PubMed ID: 12149347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.