These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9399893)

  • 1. Comparison of nonparametric statistics for detection of linkage in nuclear families: single-marker evaluation.
    Davis S; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Dec; 61(6):1431-44. PubMed ID: 9399893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.
    Abreu PC; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):847-57. PubMed ID: 10441591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis of X-linked traits in general pedigrees.
    Song KK; Feingold E; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jan; 70(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11719901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Xu W; Ma J; Greenwood CMT; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():343-373. PubMed ID: 28980254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias toward the null hypothesis in model-free linkage analysis is highly dependent on the test statistic used.
    Cordell HJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15124101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of watching our weights: how the choice of weights for non-independent sib pairs can dramatically alter results.
    Van Eerdewegh P; Dupuis J; Santangelo SL; Hayward LB; Blacker D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S373-8. PubMed ID: 10597465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient strategies for genomic searching using the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.
    Brown DL; Gorin MB; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Mar; 54(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 8116624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploiting excess sharing: a more powerful test of linkage for affected sib pairs than the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Wicks J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2005-8. PubMed ID: 10788332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of affected-sibship statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis.
    Sengul H; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jul; 69(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 11404816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
    Whittemore AS; Tu IP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the nonparametric linkage analysis using GENEHUNTER for a complicated genetic disease.
    He Q; Nemesure BB; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S611-4. PubMed ID: 10597501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multipoint linkage analysis of a candidate gene locus in rheumatoid arthritis demonstrates significant evidence of linkage and association with the corticotropin-releasing hormone genomic region.
    Fife MS; Fisher SA; John S; Worthington J; Shah CJ; Ollier WE; Panayi GS; Lewis CM; Lanchbury JS
    Arthritis Rheum; 2000 Aug; 43(8):1673-8. PubMed ID: 10943856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sib-pair analysis of the collaborative study on the genetics of alcoholism data set.
    Jorgenson E; Hinds D; Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S187-91. PubMed ID: 10597434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of evidence supporting a chromosome 6 alcoholism gene.
    Cantor RM; Lanning CD
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S91-6. PubMed ID: 10597418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonparametric simulation-based statistical analyses for bipolar affective disorder locus on chromosome 21q22.3.
    Kwok JB; Adams LJ; Salmon JA; Donald JA; Mitchell PB; Schofield PR
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 Feb; 88(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 10050976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families.
    Martin ER; Kaplan NL; Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Aug; 61(2):439-48. PubMed ID: 9311750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.