These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9400429)

  • 1. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi.
    May DJ; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 9400429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.
    Obek C; Onal B; Kantay K; Kalkan M; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V; Tansu N
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. PubMed ID: 11696710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of different treatment options for staghorn calculi.
    Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1567-71. PubMed ID: 8863539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.
    Shokeir AA; Sheir KZ; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Eassa W; El-Kappany HA
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):706-10. PubMed ID: 16813924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results.
    Albala DM; Assimos DG; Clayman RV; Denstedt JD; Grasso M; Gutierrez-Aceves J; Kahn RI; Leveillee RJ; Lingeman JE; Macaluso JN; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Newman RC; Pearle MS; Preminger GM; Teichman J; Woods JR
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2072-80. PubMed ID: 11696709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
    McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
    Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter.
    Kallidonis P; Ntasiotis P; Somani B; Adamou C; Emiliani E; Knoll T; Skolarikos A; Tailly T
    J Urol; 2020 Sep; 204(3):427-433. PubMed ID: 32150506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
    Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
    Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic outcomes of treatment for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic literature review.
    Matlaga BR; Jansen JP; Meckley LM; Byrne TW; Lingeman JE
    J Urol; 2012 Aug; 188(2):449-54. PubMed ID: 22698623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
    Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodality treatment of complex renal calculi.
    Smith JJ; Hollowell JG; Roth RA
    J Urol; 1990 May; 143(5):891-4. PubMed ID: 2329599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
    El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?
    Sorensen CM; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. PubMed ID: 12441921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi.
    Mor Y; Elmasry YE; Kellett MJ; Duffy PG
    J Urol; 1997 Sep; 158(3 Pt 2):1319-21. PubMed ID: 9258205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Juvet T; Klett DE; Borah BJ; Koo K; Rivera M; Agarwal D; Humphreys MR; Potretzke AM
    Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():71-77. PubMed ID: 34274389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
    Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Treatment of the lower pole nephrolithiasis].
    Novák K
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2005; 144 Suppl 2():45-7. PubMed ID: 16277185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of anatrophic nephrolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of patients with staghorn calculi.
    Assimos DG; Wrenn JJ; Harrison LH; McCullough DL; Boyce WH; Taylor CL; Zagoria RJ; Dyer RB
    J Urol; 1991 Apr; 145(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 2005684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors.
    Portis AJ; Yan Y; Pattaras JG; Andreoni C; Moore R; Clayman R
    J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 12478102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single stones of the lower pole of the kidney. Comparative results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Havel D; Saussine C; Fath C; Lang H; Faure F; Jacqmin D
    Eur Urol; 1998; 33(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 9612684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.