These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9401453)

  • 1. The representation of auditory source characteristics: simple geometric form.
    Lakatos S; McAdams S; Caussé R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1180-90. PubMed ID: 9401453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted bars.
    McAdams S; Chaigne A; Roussarie V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1306-20. PubMed ID: 15058353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory constraints on auditory identification of the material and geometric properties of struck bars.
    Lutfi RA; Stoelinga CN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):350-60. PubMed ID: 20058982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory detection of hollowness.
    Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1010-9. PubMed ID: 11519569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing shape.
    Kunkler-Peck AJ; Turvey MT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):279-94. PubMed ID: 10696618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification and identification of recorded and synthesized impact sounds by practiced listeners, musicians, and nonmusicians.
    Lutfi RA; Oh E; Storm E; Alexander JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):393-404. PubMed ID: 16119360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Across-frequency processing of modulation phase differences in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lentz JJ; Valentine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL205-11. PubMed ID: 26428814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory psychophysical scaling exposure effects: magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching.
    Fucci D; Petrosino L; Harris D; Randolph-Tyler E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):643-8. PubMed ID: 3399344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional control in learning to discriminate bars and gratings.
    Meinhardt G; Grabbe Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Feb; 142(4):539-50. PubMed ID: 11845249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From sound to shape: auditory perception of drawing movements.
    Thoret E; Aramaki M; Kronland-Martinet R; Velay JL; Ystad S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):983-94. PubMed ID: 24446717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal effects on visual and auditory object perception.
    O'Leary A; Rhodes G
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Jun; 35(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 6483560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
    Zhang X; Gong Q
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual components of pitch: spatial representation using a multidimensional scaling technique.
    Ueda K; Ohgushi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1193-200. PubMed ID: 3680777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of spectral difference on auditory saltation.
    Getzmann S
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 18271355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual thresholds for detecting modifications applied to the acoustical properties of a violin.
    Fritz C; Cross I; Moore BC; Woodhouse J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3640-50. PubMed ID: 18247771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception.
    Coffey EB; Colagrosso EM; Lehmann A; Schönwiesner M; Zatorre RJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152374. PubMed ID: 27015271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects.
    Goupell MJ; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3971-86. PubMed ID: 16838540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.