These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9401992)

  • 1. Accurate Estimation of Breast Tumor Size: A Comparison Between Ultrasonography, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Associated Contributing Factors.
    Azhdeh S; Kaviani A; Sadighi N; Rahmani M
    Eur J Breast Health; 2021 Jan; 17(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33796831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lipid-weighted intraoperative photoacoustic tomography of breast tumors: Volumetric comparison to preoperative MRI.
    Kosik I; Brackstone M; Kornecki A; Chamson-Reig A; Wong P; Carson JJL
    Photoacoustics; 2020 Jun; 18():100165. PubMed ID: 32426228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of MRI and US in Tumor Size Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Taydaş O; Durhan G; Akpınar MG; Demirkazık FB
    Eur J Breast Health; 2019 Apr; 15(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 31001614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the concordance of radiologic and pathologic tumor size in breast carcinoma.
    Hamza A; Khawar S; Sakhi R; Alrajjal A; Miller S; Ibrar W; Edens J; Salehi S; Ockner D
    Ultrasound; 2019 Feb; 27(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 30774698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of tumor size in breast cancer comparing clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and MRI-correlation with the pathological analysis of the surgical specimen.
    Cortadellas T; Argacha P; Acosta J; Rabasa J; Peiró R; Gomez M; Rodellar L; Gomez S; Navarro-Golobart A; Sanchez-Mendez S; Martinez-Medina M; Botey M; Muñoz-Ramos C; Xiberta M
    Gland Surg; 2017 Aug; 6(4):330-335. PubMed ID: 28861372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mammography and ultrasound in detecting residual disease following bioptic lumpectomy in breast cancer patients.
    Wu X; Lin Q; Lu J; Chen G; Zeng YI; Lin Y; Chen Y; Wang Y; Yan J
    Mol Clin Oncol; 2016 Mar; 4(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 26998296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of primary breast cancer size and T-stage using micro-computed tomography in lumpectomy specimens.
    Sarraj WM; Tang R; Najjar AL; Griffin M; Bui AH; Zambeli-Ljepovic A; Senter-Zapata M; Lewin-Berlin M; Fernandez L; Buckley J; Ly A; Brachtel E; Aftreth O; Gilbertson J; Yagi Y; Gadd M; Hughes KS; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
    J Pathol Inform; 2015; 6():60. PubMed ID: 26730350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT): a novel method for determination of primary tumour dimensions in breast cancer specimens.
    Tang R; Saksena M; Coopey SB; Fernandez L; Buckley JM; Lei L; Aftreth O; Koerner F; Michaelson J; Rafferty E; Brachtel E; Smith BL
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150581. PubMed ID: 26568439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound: is a scoring system feasible? A preliminary study in China.
    Xiao X; Ou B; Yang H; Wu H; Luo B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105517. PubMed ID: 25133534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI.
    Luparia A; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ciatto S; Bosco D; Campanino PP; Castellano I; Sapino A; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2013 Oct; 118(7):1119-36. PubMed ID: 23801389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which imaging modality is superior for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer?
    Atkins JJ; Appleton CM; Fisher CS; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
    J Oncol; 2013; 2013():964863. PubMed ID: 23476649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-surgical therapy and radiologic assessment of stage I breast cancer treatment with novel enzyme-targeting radiosensitization: Kochi Oxydol-Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Carcinomas, type II (KORTUC II).
    Hitomi J; Kubota K; Ogawa Y; Hamada N; Murata Y; Nishioka A
    Exp Ther Med; 2010 Sep; 1(5):769-775. PubMed ID: 22993600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of accompanying in situ ductal carcinoma on accuracy of measuring malignant breast tumor size using B-mode ultrasonography and real-time sonoelastography.
    Soliman AA; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F
    Int J Breast Cancer; 2012; 2012():376032. PubMed ID: 22988516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of breast cancer tumour size using six different methods.
    Meier-Meitinger M; Häberle L; Fasching PA; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Wachter D; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Adamietz B
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1180-7. PubMed ID: 21191794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Keune JD; Jeffe DB; Schootman M; Hoffman A; Gillanders WE; Aft RL
    Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 20359567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Chagpar AB; Middleton LP; Sahin AA; Dempsey P; Buzdar AU; Mirza AN; Ames FC; Babiera GV; Feig BW; Hunt KK; Kuerer HM; Meric-Bernstam F; Ross MI; Singletary SE
    Ann Surg; 2006 Feb; 243(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 16432360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.
    Giannopoulou C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1173-200. PubMed ID: 12811421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer.
    Yang WT; Lam WW; Cheung H; Suen M; King WW; Metreweli C
    J Ultrasound Med; 1997 Dec; 16(12):791-7. PubMed ID: 9401992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.