101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9402779)
21. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening.
Banks E; Beral V; Cameron R; Hogg A; Langley N; Barnes I; Bull D; Reeves G; English R; Taylor S; Elliman J; Lole Harris C
Breast Cancer Res; 2002; 4(1):R1. PubMed ID: 11879559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two primary care interventions aimed at improving attendance for breast screening.
Richards SH; Bankhead C; Peters TJ; Austoker J; Hobbs FD; Brown J; Tydeman C; Roberts L; Formby J; Redman V; Wilson S; Sharp DJ
J Med Screen; 2001; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 11480450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect on breast cancer screening response in The Netherlands of inviting women for an additional scientific investigation.
Peeters PH; Beckers CG; Hogervorst JM; Collette HJ
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Apr; 48(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 8189174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use and overlap of AED and general practice services by patients registered at two inner London general practices.
Hull S; Jones IR; Moser K; Fisher J
Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Sep; 48(434):1575-9. PubMed ID: 9830182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The relevance of ethnic monitoring in the experience of Haringey Healthcare NHS trust community family planning clinics.
Christopher E
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):123-7. PubMed ID: 10023096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Major ethnic group differences in breast cancer screening uptake in Scotland are not extinguished by adjustment for indices of geographical residence, area deprivation, long-term illness and education.
Bansal N; Bhopal RS; Steiner MF; Brewster DH;
Br J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 106(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 22415231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
Hobbs P; Kay C; Friedman EH; St Leger AS; Lambert C; Boggis CR; Howard TM; Owen AW; Asbury DL
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1314-6. PubMed ID: 2271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.
Haiart DC; McKenzie L; Henderson J; Pollock W; McQueen DV; Roberts MM; Forrest AP
Public Health; 1990 Jul; 104(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 2382005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethnic influences on body awareness, trait anxiety, perceived risk, and breast and gynecologic cancer screening practices.
Foxall MJ; Barron CR; Houfek JF
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001 May; 28(4):727-38. PubMed ID: 11383186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fair shares in health care? Ethnic and socioeconomic influences on recording of preventive care in selected inner London general practices. Healthy Eastenders Project.
Atri J; Falshaw M; Linvingstone A; Robson J
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7031):614-7. PubMed ID: 8595338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.
Orton M; Fitzpatrick R; Fuller A; Mant D; Mlynek C; Thorogood M
Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Aug; 41(349):320-2. PubMed ID: 1777275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving uptake of a breast screening programme: A knowledge management approach for opportunistic intervention.
Baskaran V; Bali RK; Arochena H; Naguib RN; Wheaton M; Wallis M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 121():191-7. PubMed ID: 17095817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Indirect discrimination and breast screening.
Botha JL; Manku-Scott TK; Moledina F; Williams A
Ethn Dis; 1993; 3(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 8324497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.
Marteau TM; Mann E; Prevost AT; Vasconcelos JC; Kellar I; Sanderson S; Parker M; Griffin S; Sutton S; Kinmonth AL
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2138. PubMed ID: 20466791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Randomised trial of prostate cancer screening in The Netherlands: assessment of acceptance and motives for attendance.
Nijs HG; Tordoir DM; Schuurman JH; Kirkels WJ; Schröder FH
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9275269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting uptake of cervical and breast cancer screening among perimenopausal women in Hong Kong.
Chan C; Ho SC; Chan SG; Yip YB; Wong FC; Cheng F
Hong Kong Med J; 2002 Oct; 8(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 12376710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
