These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 940388)

  • 1. A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses.
    Shannon GF
    Med Biol Eng; 1976 May; 14(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 940388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory feedback in a myoelectric upper limb prosthesis: a preliminary report.
    Brittain RH; Sauter WF; Gibson DA
    Can J Surg; 1979 Sep; 22(5):481-2. PubMed ID: 497919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sensory feedback system for an upper-limb amputation prosthesis.
    Clippinger FW; Avery R; Titus BR
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1974; ():247-58. PubMed ID: 4462906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration of motor control and proprioceptive and cutaneous sensation in humans with prior upper-limb amputation via multiple Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) implanted in residual peripheral arm nerves.
    Wendelken S; Page DM; Davis T; Wark HAC; Kluger DT; Duncan C; Warren DJ; Hutchinson DT; Clark GA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 14(1):121. PubMed ID: 29178940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory feedback for powered limb prostheses.
    Rohland TA
    Med Biol Eng; 1975 Mar; 13(2):300-1. PubMed ID: 1195823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory feedback control of upper- and lower-extremity motor prostheses.
    Phillips CA
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1988; 16(2):105-40. PubMed ID: 3053043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental development of a sensory control system for an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis with cosmetic covering.
    Tura A; Lamberti C; Davalli A; Sacchetti R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 9505249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensory Feedback for Upper-Limb Prostheses: Opportunities and Barriers.
    Jabban L; Dupan S; Zhang D; Ainsworth B; Nazarpour K; Metcalfe BW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():738-747. PubMed ID: 35290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.
    Krueger AR; Giannoni P; Shah V; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):36. PubMed ID: 28464891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs.
    Schmidl H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1977 Apr; 1(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 615983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses.
    Svensson P; Wijk U; Björkman A; Antfolk C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Jun; 14(6):439-447. PubMed ID: 28532184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm.
    Dhillon GS; Horch KW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 16425828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses.
    Hsiao SS; Fettiplace M; Darbandi B
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 192():69-81. PubMed ID: 21763519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ["Bionic" arm prostheses. State of the art in research and development].
    Pylatiuk C; Döderlein L
    Orthopade; 2006 Nov; 35(11):1169-70, 1172-5. PubMed ID: 16932834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review.
    Schofield JS; Evans KR; Carey JP; Hebert JS
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Sep; 11(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 24928327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Phantom limb sensation in use of artificial limbs].
    HOFMANN H
    Med Tech (Stuttg); 1951 Mar; 5(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 14842580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis.
    Rosén B; Ehrsson HH; Antfolk C; Cipriani C; Sebelius F; Lundborg G
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2009; 43(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 19863429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Touch on predefined areas on the forearm can be associated with specific fingers: Towards a new principle for sensory feedback in hand prostheses.
    Wijk U; Svensson P; Antfolk C; Carlsson IK; Björkman A; Rosén B
    J Rehabil Med; 2019 Mar; 51(3):209-216. PubMed ID: 30815704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A SYSTEM OF POWERED PROSTHESES FOR SEVERE BILATERAL UPPER LIMB DEFICIENCY.
    SIMPSON DC; LAMB DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1965 Aug; 47():442-7. PubMed ID: 14341058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand.
    Patterson PE; Katz JA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 1740774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.