These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9403958)

  • 1. An examination of methods for sample size recalculation during an experiment.
    Betensky RA; Tierney C
    Stat Med; 1997 Nov; 16(22):2587-98. PubMed ID: 9403958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.
    Chen YH; DeMets DL; Lan KK
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1023-38. PubMed ID: 15057876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size recalculation in multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials based on noncomparative data.
    Harden M; Friede T
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1284-1299. PubMed ID: 32128868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consequences of sequential sampling for meta-analysis.
    Braschi L; Botella J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1167-83. PubMed ID: 24399083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information-based sample size re-estimation in group sequential design for longitudinal trials.
    Zhou J; Adewale A; Shentu Y; Liu J; Anderson K
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3801-14. PubMed ID: 24797715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smoothing Corrections for Improving Sample Size Recalculation Rules in Adaptive Group Sequential Study Designs.
    Herrmann C; Rauch G
    Methods Inf Med; 2021 May; 60(1-02):1-8. PubMed ID: 33648007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data adaptive interim modification of sample sizes for candidate-gene association studies.
    Scherag A; Müller HH; Dempfle A; Hebebrand J; Schäfer H
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(1-3):56-62. PubMed ID: 14614239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new conditional performance score for the evaluation of adaptive group sequential designs with sample size recalculation.
    Herrmann C; Pilz M; Kieser M; Rauch G
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2067-2100. PubMed ID: 32249968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of the Coefficient of Variation with Minimum Risk: A Sequential Method for Minimizing Sampling Error and Study Cost.
    Chattopadhyay B; Kelley K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):627-648. PubMed ID: 27712116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Chen YH; Li C; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):584-95. PubMed ID: 26195615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stepwise two-stage sample size adaptation.
    Wan H; Ellenberg SS; Anderson KM
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25252082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the weighted eta-squared effect sizes in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 22806705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy in parameter estimation for a general class of effect sizes: A sequential approach.
    Kelley K; Darku FB; Chattopadhyay B
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):226-243. PubMed ID: 28383948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate.
    Kieser M; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2000 Apr; 19(7):901-11. PubMed ID: 10750058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multi-stage drop-the-losers design for multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wason J; Stallard N; Bowden J; Jennison C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):508-524. PubMed ID: 25228636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures.
    Zucker DM; Wittes JT; Schabenberger O; Brittain E
    Stat Med; 1999 Dec; 18(24):3493-509. PubMed ID: 10611621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mid-course sample size modification in clinical trials based on the observed treatment effect.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):971-93. PubMed ID: 12627413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple procedures for blinded sample size adjustment that do not affect the type I error rate.
    Kieser M; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3571-81. PubMed ID: 14652861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.