These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Left atrial appendage function in patients with different pacing modes. Ertaş F; Güleç S; Dinçer I; Erol C; Tutar E; Güldal M; Karaoğuz R; Oral D Int J Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 73(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 10817851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). Link MS; Hellkamp AS; Estes NA; Orav EJ; Ellenbogen KA; Ibrahim B; Greenspon A; Rizo-Patron C; Goldman L; Lee KL; Lamas GA; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 43(11):2066-71. PubMed ID: 15172414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study. Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities. Irwin M; Carbol B; Senaratne M; Gulamhusein S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. PubMed ID: 8945043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. VVI pacing with normal QRS duration and ventricular function: MOST trial findings relevant to leadless pacemakers. Loring Z; North R; Hellkamp AS; Atwater BD; Frazier-Mills CG; Jackson KP; Pokorney SD; Lamas GA; Piccini JP Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1461-1466. PubMed ID: 33085123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony determines abnormal heightening of plasma N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide level in symptomatic bradyarrhythmia patients with chronic dual-chamber vs. single-chamber atrial pacing. Lin JM; Lai LP; Tsai CT; Lin LC; Tseng CD; Lin JL Cardiology; 2008; 110(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 18057888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature. Sutton R; Bourgeois I Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing. Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DDDR pacing results in left ventricular asynchrony with preservation of ejection fraction and NT-proBNP: a prospective study in sick sinus syndrome and normal ventricular function. Psychari SN; Apostolou TS; Iliodromitis EK; Charalampopoulos A; Kremastinos DT Int J Cardiol; 2010 Oct; 144(2):310-2. PubMed ID: 19342110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. DDD versus VVIR pacing in patients, ages 70 and over, with complete heart block. Ouali S; Neffeti E; Ghoul K; Hammas S; Kacem S; Gribaa R; Remedi F; Boughzela E Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 33(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 20015129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of DDD versus VVIR pacing modes in elderly patients with atrioventricular block. Kılıçaslan B; Vatansever Ağca F; Kılıçaslan EE; Kınay O; Tigen K; Cakır C; Nazlı C; Ergene O Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2012 Jun; 40(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22951849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term? Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing. Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]