These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9405778)

  • 1. Imaging orthopedic hardware with an emphasis on hip prostheses.
    Eustace S; Shah B; Mason M
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 29(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 9405778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR imaging of metal-on-metal hip prostheses.
    Campe CB; Palmer WE
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Feb; 21(1):155-68. PubMed ID: 23168189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications.
    Roth TD; Maertz NA; Parr JA; Buckwalter KA; Choplin RH
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(4):1089-107. PubMed ID: 22786996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging orthopedic implant infections.
    Cyteval C; Bourdon A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2012 Jun; 93(6):547-57. PubMed ID: 22521777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthopedic spinal and hip prostheses: effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts during MR arteriography and venography of abdomen and pelvis.
    Fidelman NA; Wilson MW; Bloom AI; Kerlan RK; LaBerge JM; Gordon RL
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):894-9. PubMed ID: 16926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Importance of SPECT/CT for knee and hip joint prostheses].
    Strobel K; Steurer-Dober I; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Allgayer B
    Radiologe; 2012 Jul; 52(7):629-35. PubMed ID: 22801790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT of hip prosthesis: New techniques and new paradigms.
    Blum A; Meyer JB; Raymond A; Louis M; Bakour O; Kechidi R; Chanson A; Gondim-Teixeira P
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016; 97(7-8):725-33. PubMed ID: 27451263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [CT evaluation of total HIP prosthesis infection].
    Jacquier A; Champsaur P; Vidal V; Stein A; Monnet O; Drancourt M; Argenson JN; Raoult D; Moulin G; Bartoli JM
    J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 85(12 Pt 1):2005-12. PubMed ID: 15692411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact.
    Eustace S; Goldberg R; Williamson D; Melhem ER; Oladipo O; Yucel EK; Jara H
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Aug; 52(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 9285418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Buckwalter KA; Lin C; Ford JM
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2011 Sep; 15(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 21928156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metal artifact reduction: standard and advanced magnetic resonance and computed tomography techniques.
    Gupta A; Subhas N; Primak AN; Nittka M; Liu K
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2015 May; 53(3):531-47. PubMed ID: 25953288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of dual-phase 18F-fluoride PET/CT and three phase bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of septic (or painful) hip prostheses: A prospective study.
    Kumar R; Kumar R; Kumar V; Malhotra R
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 26850923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hart AJ; Satchithananda K; Liddle AD; Sabah SA; McRobbie D; Henckel J; Cobb JP; Skinner JA; Mitchell AW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 94(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 22336970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between synovitis, loosening and infection of hip and knee prostheses.
    Manthey N; Reinhard P; Moog F; Knesewitsch P; Hahn K; Tatsch K
    Nucl Med Commun; 2002 Jul; 23(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 12089487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of painful joint prostheses.
    Arıcan P; Okudan Tekin B; Şefizade R; Naldöken S; Baştuğ A; Özkurt B
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Sep; 36(9):931-40. PubMed ID: 26049374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging.
    Cyteval C; Hamm V; Sarrabère MP; Lopez FM; Maury P; Taourel P
    Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):477-83. PubMed ID: 12147845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee.
    Della Valle C; Parvizi J; Bauer TW; DiCesare PE; Evans RP; Segreti J; Spangehl M; Watters WC; Keith M; Turkelson CM; Wies JL; Sluka P; Hitchcock K;
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(14):1355-7. PubMed ID: 21792503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.
    Lee MJ; Kim S; Lee SA; Song HT; Huh YM; Kim DH; Han SH; Suh JS
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 17495293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of hip arthroplasty.
    Fritz J; Lurie B; Miller TT
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2013 Jul; 17(3):316-27. PubMed ID: 23787986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of hip infection and inflammation.
    Maj L; Gombar Y; Morrison WB
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Feb; 21(1):127-39. PubMed ID: 23168187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.