These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9407858)

  • 1. Restoring confidence.
    Oliver G
    Nurs Stand; 1997 Oct 29-Nov 4; 12(6):16. PubMed ID: 9407858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Lewis LS
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6656):1129. PubMed ID: 3143459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing screening in the NHS.
    Calman K
    J Med Screen; 1994 Apr; 1(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8790496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening: the potential contribution of workplace examinations.
    Morris GJ
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1988 May; 46(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 3182255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerisation of screening for cervical cancer. The OCCURS Group.
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1988 May; 46(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 3182253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organization and quality control in screening for cervical cancer in Finland.
    Kauraniemi T
    Nowotwory; 1985; 35(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 3831942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for cervical cancer: revised policy. The recommendations of the DHSS Committee on Gynaecological Cytology.
    Draper GJ
    Health Trends; 1982 May; 14(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 10258580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resulting fears.
    Willis J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Feb 21-27; 86(8):16-7. PubMed ID: 2320462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening should continue after age 65, study concludes.
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g261. PubMed ID: 24429373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
    Husain OA
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Nov; 293(6557):1308-9. PubMed ID: 3096483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The (in)efficiency of cervical screening in Europe.
    Miller AB
    Eur J Cancer; 2002 Feb; 38(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 11818195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cytology screening.
    Sherwood A
    BMJ; 1988 Sep; 297(6648):625. PubMed ID: 3139256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards effective cervical screening.
    Havelock C; Havelock P
    Practitioner; 1994 Apr; 238(1537):296-301. PubMed ID: 8183816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of a cancer control programme.
    Knox EG; Woodman CB
    Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 3242791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Organisation of a programme for cervical cancer screening. ICRF coordinating committee on cervical screening.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):894-5. PubMed ID: 6434132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening in the central region of Portugal.
    Real O; Silva D; Leitão MA; Oliveira HM; Rocha Alves JG
    Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2247-9. PubMed ID: 11072214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National cervical screening programme.
    Slater D
    BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):887-8. PubMed ID: 2261531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical screening laboratories should be accredited.
    Beecham L
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7131):572. PubMed ID: 9518900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Improved screening of cervical cancer].
    Bergogne A
    Rev Infirm; 1991 Apr; 41(8):14-5. PubMed ID: 1853074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.