These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9408613)

  • 1. Complications of cardiac angiography using low- or high-osmolality contrast agents in patients with left main coronary stenosis.
    Kussmaul WG; Mishra JP; Matthai WH; Hirshfeld JW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Dec; 42(4):376-9. PubMed ID: 9408613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.
    Matthai WH; Kussmaul WG; Krol J; Goin JE; Schwartz JS; Hirshfeld JW
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):291-301. PubMed ID: 8281660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP; Moore RD; Powe NR; Gopalan R; Davidoff AJ; Litt M; Graziano S; Brinker JA
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dealing with the highs and lows of contrast agents in left main disease.
    Hardee MS; Bashore TM
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Dec; 42(4):380. PubMed ID: 9408614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse effects of calcium binding contrast agents in diagnostic cardiac angiography. A comparison between formulations with and without calcium binding additives.
    Matthai WH; Groh WC; Waxman HL; Kurnik PB
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):663-8. PubMed ID: 8557507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Early hemodynamic cardiovascular reactions to nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Wink K
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Sep; 41(9):384-8. PubMed ID: 3175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast agents on contrast-induced nephropathy and tissue reperfusion in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction [CONTRAST-AMI] Trial).
    Bolognese L; Falsini G; Schwenke C; Grotti S; Limbruno U; Liistro F; Carrera A; Angioli P; Picchi A; Ducci K; Pierli C
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 109(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 21943940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and tolerability of iopromide in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: real-world multicenter experience with 17,513 patients from the TRUST trial.
    Chen JY; Liu Y; Zhou YL; Tan N; Zhang B; Chen PY; Chen LB
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 31(7):1281-91. PubMed ID: 26058857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of high and low osmolar roentgen contrast media in quantitative coronary angiography].
    Jost S; Rafflenbeul W; Gerhardt U; Nellessen U; Reil GH; Hecker H; Lichtlen P
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Dec; 77(12):755-66. PubMed ID: 3074595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina.
    Qureshi NR; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography.
    Powe NR; Davidoff AJ; Moore RD; Brinker JA; Anderson GF; Litt MR; Gopalan R; Graziano SL; Steinberg EP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 8496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and criteria for selective use of low-osmolality contrast for cardiac angiography.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Morton BC
    Med Care; 1998 Aug; 36(8):1189-97. PubMed ID: 9708591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
    Vik-Mo H; Følling M; Barth P; Nordrehaug JE; Bjørkhaug A; Rosland GA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse reactions to contrast media: factors that determine the cost of treatment.
    Powe NR; Moore RD; Steinberg EP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 8273616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media is equal in low risk patients.
    Feldkamp T; Baumgart D; Elsner M; Herget-Rosenthal S; Pietruck F; Erbel R; Philipp T; Kribben A
    Clin Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 66(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 17140161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.