106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9409051)
1. Tissue radiation dosages using the RVG-S with and without niobium filtration.
Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Brand JW; Kelly MS
Aust Dent J; 1997 Oct; 42(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 9409051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptibility of defects in an aluminum test object: a comparison of the RVG-S and first generation VIXA systems with and without added niobium filtration.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 9161163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin exposure and thyroid dose distribution using niobium filtration.
Byrne CM; Pharoah MJ; Wood RE
J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug; 57(8):663-5. PubMed ID: 1889018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Niobi-X filtration in intraoral radiology.
White SC; Gratt BM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Dec; 72(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 1812457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic image quality and dose reduction using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8181645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct digital imaging with and without niobium filtration for detection of density differences beneath steel orthodontic bands.
Borden DR; Farman AG; Yancey J; Kelley MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 7835513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of thin K-edge filters on radiation dose in dental radiography.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):990-5. PubMed ID: 1450837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric study of mandible examinations performed with three cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Khoury HJ; Andrade ME; Araujo MW; Brasileiro IV; Kramer R; Huda A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):162-5. PubMed ID: 25897144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the use of a niobium filter for patient dose reduction in chest radiography.
Thierens H; Kunnen M; Van der Plaetsen A; Segaert O
Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):334-40. PubMed ID: 2025775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
