230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9409947)
1. [Correlation between skinfold thickness and ultrasonography in the study of subcutaneous adipose tissue in females].
Cataldo MG; Brancato D; Brancato G; Verga S; Buscemi S; Licata G
Ann Ital Med Int; 1997; 12(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9409947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Value of echography in the measurement of changes in the total and visceral adipose mass].
Armellini F; Zamboni M; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Robbi R; Vicentini R; De Marchi M; Formentini G; Bosello O
Minerva Endocrinol; 1991; 16(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1944012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of body composition in Chinese and British men by ultrasonographic assessment of segmental adipose tissue volume.
Eston R; Evans R; Fu F
Br J Sports Med; 1994 Mar; 28(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 8044501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of the ultrasonic technique as a method of measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Haymes EM; Lundegren HM; Loomis JL; Buskirk ER
Ann Hum Biol; 1976 May; 3(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 962304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suprailiac or abdominal skinfold thickness measured with a skinfold caliper as a predictor of body density in Japanese adults.
Demura S; Sato S
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2007 Sep; 213(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17785953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
Chumlea WC; Roche AF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cadaver studies and their impact on the understanding of human adiposity.
Clarys JP; Provyn S; Marfell-Jones MJ
Ergonomics; 2005 Sep 15-Nov 15; 48(11-14):1445-61. PubMed ID: 16338712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
Ramirez ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel method for measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound in children - interobserver consistency.
ChiriŢă-Emandi A; Papa MC; Abrudan L; Dobrescu MA; Puiu M; Velea IP; Paul C
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2017; 58(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 28523306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements.
Hammond J; Rona RJ; Chinn S
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Mar; 48(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8194501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of intra-abdominal fat? A comparison with computed tomography].
Cucchi E; Piatti PM; Orena C; Pontiroli AE; Martino E; Paesano PL; Pozza G; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 9465239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the subcutaneous fat layer, as measured by ultrasound, skinfold calipers and BMI, on the EMG amplitude.
Nordander C; Willner J; Hansson GA; Larsson B; Unge J; Granquist L; Skerfving S
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Aug; 89(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 12712347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Body Fat Percentage Using B-Mode Ultrasound Technique versus Skinfold Caliper in Obese Healthy Volunteers.
Ingle AS; Kashyap NK; Trivedi S; Choudhary R; Suryavanshi G; Thangaraju P; Bagale KR
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e22993. PubMed ID: 35415052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
