134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9410005)
1. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis].
Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
Honda C; Ohara H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging.
Gravel P; Després P; Beaudoin G; de Guise JA
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of blue and green systems of image visualization in roentgenology].
Riuduger IuG
Med Tekh; 2004; (6):40-5. PubMed ID: 15656416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Digital luminescence radiography. A new method of study in thoracic diagnosis at the intensive care unit].
Witte G; Pothmann W; Bause H; Nicolas V; Schulte am Esch J; Bücheler E
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2653089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
