These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9410154)

  • 1. [Effect of boundary element discretization on forward calculation and the inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Sep; 42(9):240-8. PubMed ID: 9410154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of discrete analysis of boundary elements on forward calculation and the inverse problem in EEG and MEG].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():181-2. PubMed ID: 9517104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4903-6. PubMed ID: 23367027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [EEG/MEG source localization in local stimulation of the retina].
    Schellhorn K; Hoenecke O; Haueisen J; Schultheiss B; Henning G; Husar P; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():437-8. PubMed ID: 9517226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of conductivity changes in boundary element compartments on the forward and inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Nowak H; Brauer H; Weiller C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999 Jun; 44(6):150-7. PubMed ID: 10427910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model.
    Scheler G; Fischer MJ; Genow A; Hummel C; Rampp S; Paulini A; Hopfengärtner R; Kaltenhäuser M; Stefan H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Apr; 28(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 16933294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localisation of epileptic foci with multichannel magnetoencephalography, MEG.
    Knutsson E; Gransberg L
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1995; 64():74-8. PubMed ID: 8748588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem for N(20)-P (20) somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J; Savard P
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jan; 26(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22723019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
    Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clustering of early cortical responses to median nerve stimulation from average and single trial MEG and EEG signals.
    Zainea OF; Kostopoulos GK; Ioannides AA
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 17(4):219-36. PubMed ID: 16110772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.