These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9410629)
21. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy using three different plate systems. Ueki K; Okabe K; Moroi A; Marukawa K; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Nakagawa K Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):942-8. PubMed ID: 22537517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback. Oh JS; Kim SG J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles. Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Appropriate diameter for screws to fix the maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy: an investigation utilizing finite element analysis. Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Hikosaka M; Nagasao M; Tokumaru Y; Ogawa K; Nakajima T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):227-33. PubMed ID: 17855106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation. Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stability of the miniplate osteosynthesis used for sagittal split osteotomy for closing an anterior open bite: an experimental study in mini-pigs. Nieblerová J; Foltán R; Hanzelka T; Pavlíková G; Vlk M; Klíma K; Samsonyan L Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 22154574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques. Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Which kind of frontal mandibulotomy is the smartest? A biomechanical study. Steiner T; Raith S; Scherer E; Mücke T; Torsiglieri T; Rohleder NH; Eder M; Grohmann I; Kesting M; Bier H; Wolff KD; Hölzle F J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 25499912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method. Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation. Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases. Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies. Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro resistance of titanium and resorbable (poly L-co-DL lactic acid) osteosynthesis in mandibular body fracture. Rodríguez-Chessa J; Olate S; Netto HD; Noia C; de Moraes M; Mazzonetto R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 43(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 24094615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Study by finite element method of the mechanical stress of selected biodegradable osteosynthesis screws in sagittal ramus osteotomy. Maurer P; Holweg S; Knoll WD; Schubert J Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 40(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 11883977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Removal of bicortical screws and other osteosynthesis material that caused symptoms after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a retrospective study of 251 patients, and review of published papers. Verweij JP; Houppermans PN; Mensink G; van Merkesteyn JP Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 52(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 24953784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]