These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9410926)

  • 21. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of dinoprostone on uterine cervix ripening and the course of labor.
    Wielgos M; Szymusik I; Kosinska-Kaczynska K; Suchonska B; Kaminski P; Banaszek-Wysoczanska A; Bomba-Opon D; Szpotanska M
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Aug; 28(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 17693987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Labor induction: a decade of change.
    Baxley EG
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2076, 2078, 2083-4. PubMed ID: 12776959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term in women with unfavorable cervix: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Levy R; Vaisbuch E; Furman B; Brown D; Volach V; Hagay ZJ
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 17343543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
    Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [New developments in labor induction].
    Yulzari-Roll V; Hod M; Bar J
    Harefuah; 2002 Apr; 141(4):369-73, 408. PubMed ID: 12017894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Labor induction in preeclampsia: is misoprostol more effective than dinoprostone?
    Lapaire O; Zanetti-Dällenbach R; Weber P; Hösli I; Holzgreve W; Surbek D
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17378719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening.
    Miller AM; Lorkovic M
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1993; Suppl():23-30. PubMed ID: 8271913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cervical ripening using vaginal misoprostol before hysteroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial.
    Waddell G; Desindes S; Takser L; Beauchemin MC; Bessette P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 18971139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ripening of the human cervix].
    Li WJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jan; 20(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3156731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cervical ripening using misoprostol before hysteroscopy].
    Agostini A; Blanc K; Ronda I; Capelle M; Cravello L; Blanc B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jan; 34(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 16413811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Induction of labor with misoprostol--vaginal administration].
    Koleva Zh; Iankov M; Katsulov A; Savova S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16028371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
    Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.