These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Purchasers and payers drive the definition of value and quality in integrated healthcare systems. Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1996 Sep; 5(9):1-5. PubMed ID: 10159936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Peer case review sharpens event analysis. Hitchings KS; Davies-Hathen N; Capuano TA; Morgan G; Bendekovits R J Nurs Care Qual; 2008; 23(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 18528303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches? Donovan RE J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Selected aspects for quality assurance in family practice]. Neumann-Oellerking D; Havel M Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 May; 92(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 9675824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Quality assurance in dentistry]. Poorterman JH; Eijkman MA; Kieft JA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Aug; 100(8):355-7. PubMed ID: 11913351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide. Grol R Qual Health Care; 1994 Sep; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 10139412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The future for peer review. Florida's constitutional amendment chills quality community. Glabman M Trustee; 2005 Apr; 58(4):6-10, 12, 1. PubMed ID: 15881498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [From quality circles to evidence-based clinical practice--a status article on quality development. III. Responsibility and tasks]. Knudsen JL; Kjoergaard J; Mainz J Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Nov; 160(48):6945-50. PubMed ID: 9846087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic quality circles in a health maintenance organization. Harman LB Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Jun; 6(4):72-9. PubMed ID: 10276539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The co-regulation of medical discipline: challenging medical peer review. Thomas D J Law Med; 2004 Feb; 11(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 15018214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [New tracks to improving the economics and the quality of the Swiss health system]. Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):335-43. PubMed ID: 15095719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Quality management--should it remain as is or be changed? On the medical practice of a "learning organization"]. Radau T Urologe A; 2004 Sep; 43(9):1171-3. PubMed ID: 15368050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Health data and quality registries can learn from each other]. Allebeck P Lakartidningen; 1999 Sep; 96(35):3632-4. PubMed ID: 10492563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer review in a quality assurance program: a physician acceptance model for a teaching hospital service. Embry R; Hansen M Adm Radiol; 1994 Apr; 13(4):43, 48. PubMed ID: 10134643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [From quality circles to evidence-based clinical practice--a status article on quality development. I. Concepts, methods and strategies]. Kjaergaard J; Knudsen JL; Mainz J Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Nov; 160(46):6638-43. PubMed ID: 9825680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Approaches to ethical decision making in correlation with medical quality management]. Woopen C Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Jan; 94(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10721163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]