These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9411264)

  • 1. Confusion about breast-cancer screening.
    Linton OW
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Dec; 337(25):1850. PubMed ID: 9411264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
    Fletcher SW
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Apr; 336(16):1180-3. PubMed ID: 9099666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 9885578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
    Patti J; Lee C
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
    Berlin L; Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
    Baines CJ
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):298; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 20851950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image problems. Science, fear and the politics of mammograms.
    Speer TL
    Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Jun; 71(11):36, 38. PubMed ID: 9189023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
    Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differing perspectives on preventive care guidelines: a new look at the mammography controversy.
    Woolf SH; Dickey LL
    Am J Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 17(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 10606194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):294-5; author reply 295. PubMed ID: 20851947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mammography muddle.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1151. PubMed ID: 9129402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mammogram war.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 1997 Feb; 129(8):54-8. PubMed ID: 10164990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the recent consensus development panel on screening women aged 40-49 for breast cancer.
    Monsees BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):625-6. PubMed ID: 9275866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH consensus panel spurs discontent.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(7):519-20. PubMed ID: 9032145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening policy.
    Marshall B
    N Z Med J; 1998 Sep; 111(1073):350. PubMed ID: 9785556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Final mammography recommendation?
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1997 Apr; 277(15):1181. PubMed ID: 9103327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The breast-screening brawl.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1056-9. PubMed ID: 9054004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NCI reverses one expert panel, sides with another.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5309):27-8. PubMed ID: 9122702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Report of the NMA panel on mammography.
    Morgan RC
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 Jul; 89(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 9220692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit and harm associated with screening for breast cancer.
    Sox HC
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1145-6. PubMed ID: 9545364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.