131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9411475)
1. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Funke M; Wiese M; von Heyden D; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Initial clinical experiences with digital full-field mammography].
Grebe S; Diekmann F; Bick U; Paepke S; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(11):589-94. PubMed ID: 11127776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming].
Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Direct radiographic magnification mammography with a new microfocus tube. Experimental studies of resolution and radiation exposure].
Post K; Hermann KP; Funke M; Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):604-9. PubMed ID: 9411476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of direct radiographic enlargement (DIMA) in early detection of rheumatic inflammatory lesions. Comparative evaluation with high resolution conventional imaging technique].
Link TM; Fiebich M; Gaubitz M; Krause F; Vestring T; Schneider M; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 7938489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.
Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraction of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using regional watershed.
Bhajammanavar VM; Keong KC; Krishnan SM
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):127-9. PubMed ID: 10847380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical experiences with direct magnification mammography with the DIMA Plus M11].
von Fournier D; Darai S; Ditzen H; Harcos A; Broitmann L; Anton HW; Bürkelbach J; Zaers J; van Woudenberg S; von Brenndorf AI
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10091304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography].
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bick U; Rogalla P; Blohmer JU; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 11885006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann K; Oestmann J; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
