131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9411475)
21. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.
Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Sechopoulos I; D'Orsi CJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 17522348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Whitman GJ; Johnston DA; Yang WT; Selinko V; Arribas E; Dogan B; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Comparison between electronic zoom and geometric magnification of clusters of microcalcifications on digital mammography].
Moraux-Wallyn M; Chaveron C; Bachelle F; Taieb S; Ceugnart L
J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 91(9 Pt 1):879-83. PubMed ID: 20814375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Bautz W
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):965-8. PubMed ID: 11199438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms.
Nakayama R; Watanabe R; Namba K; Takeda K; Yamamoto K; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1219-28. PubMed ID: 16979071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading].
Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [A new specimen radiography device with a maximum 20-fold magnification for breast diagnosis].
Moritz JD; Westerhof JP; Funke M; Breiter N; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1998 Feb; 168(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 9519044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS.
Haygood TM; Whitman GJ; Atkinson EN; Nikolova RG; Sandoval SY; Dempsey PJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 18359447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
Honda C; Ohara H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Fallenberg EM; Dimitrijevic L; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Kettritz U; Poellinger A; Bick U; Winzer KJ; Engelken F; Renz DM
Rofo; 2014 Mar; 186(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 23999780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Computer-aided segmentation, form analysis and classification of 2975 breast microcalcifications using 7-fold microfocus magnification mammography].
Grunert JH; Khalifa R; Gmelin E
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1759-65. PubMed ID: 15573286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
