139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9411478)
1. [Quality assurance in roentgen mammography. Comparison of recommended EUREF guidelines with relevant German regulations].
Zaers J; van Woudenberg S; Brix G
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 9411478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The quality of digital mammograms. Development and use of phantoms for optimal safety].
Schöfer H; Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Britsch S; Reiser M
Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15747150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Physical and technical quality assurance in German breast cancer screening: progress report of the Reference Center Muenster after three years].
Sommer A; Girnus R; Wendt B; Czwoydzinski J; Wüstenbecker C; Heindel W; Lenzen H
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 19391067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance in Mammography: An overview.
Feigin K
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110935. PubMed ID: 37354771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Concept and implementation of model projects for mammography screening in Germany].
Junkermann H; Becker N; Peitgen HO
Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 11388053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].
Becker N
Radiologe; 2006 Nov; 46(11):984-92. PubMed ID: 16177930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Plans of the German Roentgen Society and the Professional Association for Quality Assurance in Mammography].
Heywang-Köbrunner SH
Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 11388056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
von Fournier D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conversion factors between human and automatic readouts of CDMAM phantom images of CR mammography systems.
Figl M; Homolka P; Osanna-Elliott A; Semturs F; Kaar M; Hummel J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(18):N514-N521. PubMed ID: 27580001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mammography screening].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Becker N; Bock K; Anders K; Bautz W
Radiologe; 2007 Apr; 47(4):359-69; quiz 370. PubMed ID: 17375277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MQSA: the final rule.
Linver M; Newman J
Radiol Technol; 1999; 70(4):338-53; quiz 354-6. PubMed ID: 10101751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European guidelines for quality assurance in the surgical management of mammographically detected lesions.
O'Higgins N; Linos DA; Blichert-Toft M; Cataliotti L; de Wolf C; Rochard F; Rutgers EJ; Roberts P; Mattheiem W; da Silva MA; Holmberg L; Schulz KD; Smola MG; Mansel RE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1998 Apr; 24(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 9591022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Breast cancer screening: a current topic].
Gilles R; Dilhuydy M
J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):619-20. PubMed ID: 11449163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Film-screen combinations for mammography].
Säbel M; Aichinger H
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 May; 1(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 1878377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Oct; 21(2):3. PubMed ID: 24432454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mammography screening. Concept, quality assurance and interdisciplinary cooperation].
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Nährig J; Hacker A
Pathologe; 2008 Nov; 29 Suppl 2():163-7. PubMed ID: 18807041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
