146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9411690)
1. [Paternity testing expertise].
Brandt-Casadevall C
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Sep; 117(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 9411690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [STR and RFLP polymorphism in paternity determination based on family investigation].
Jacewicz R; Szram S
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 15984118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of DNA probes in paternity testing.
Rosner GL
Clin Lab Sci; 1991; 4(6):336-8. PubMed ID: 10150130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Disputable paternity expertises in the material of the Department of Forensic Medicine Medical Academy of Białystok.
Janica J; Koc-Zórawska E; Pepiński W; Skawrońska M; Niemcunowicz-Janica A
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2000; 45():122-32. PubMed ID: 11712423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parentage analysis for three Romanian families by DNA-fingerprinting.
Ceacareanu AC; Ceacareanu B; Ofiteru A; Szegli G
Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 1999; 58(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11845457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A report of the 1995 and 1996 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics.
Bjerre A; Court DS; Lincoln P; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Nov; 90(1-2):41-55. PubMed ID: 9438364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relevance of paternity analysis in Romanian population using the D1S80 locus.
Ceacăreanu AC; Ceacăreanu B
Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 1999; 58(3-4):281-8. PubMed ID: 11845466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-fragment phenotype in the D16S309 locus.
Raczek E; Nowicka L
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(4):436-8. PubMed ID: 18432147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An IS6110-targeting fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism alternative to IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA fingerprinting.
Thorne N; Evans JT; Smith EG; Hawkey PM; Gharbia S; Arnold C
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2007 Oct; 13(10):964-70. PubMed ID: 17803750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretation and statistical evaluation of multilocus DNA fingerprints in paternity and relationship testing.
Rysiecki G; Brookfield JF
Methods Mol Biol; 1998; 98():97-103. PubMed ID: 9664558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Products of partial digestion with Hae III. Part 2. Quantification.
Duewer DL; Benzinger EA
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Sep; 42(5):864-72. PubMed ID: 9304833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Paternity exclusion tests in the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Medical Sciences in Poznan].
Koralewska-Kordel M; Kordel K; Przybylski Z; Wiśniewski SA
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 17249373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Possibility of paternity testing using RFLP analysis on a very small amount of material.
Yamada Y; Kobayashi M; Takatori T; Nagao M; Ohira H; Yamamoto I; Ohtani S
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2001 Jun; 19(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11494675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA-based paternity testing in Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical Academy of Bialystok, Poland.
Skawrońska M; Koc-Zórawska E; Pepiński W; Janica J; Niemcunowicz-Janica A
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2002; 47():287-93. PubMed ID: 12533972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fingerprints for identity determination: comparison with traditional paternity testing methods--Part I.
Tonelli LA; Markowicz KR; Anderson MB; Green DJ; Herrin GL; Cotton RW; Dykes DD; Garner DD
J Forensic Sci; 1990 Nov; 35(6):1265-9. PubMed ID: 2262765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In utero paternity testing following alleged sexual assault. A comparison of DNA-based methods.
Hammond HA; Redman JB; Caskey CT
JAMA; 1995 Jun; 273(22):1774-7. PubMed ID: 7769772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic witness: by thy DNA so shall ye be known.
Smith DM
Health Law J; 1993; 1():207-44. PubMed ID: 10569856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinguishing minisatellite mutation from non-paternity by MVR-PCR.
Tamaki K; Brenner CH; Jeffreys AJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Sep; 113(1-3):55-62. PubMed ID: 10978602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A report of the 2002-2008 paternity testing workshops of the English speaking working group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics.
Thomsen AR; Hallenberg C; Simonsen BT; Langkjaer RB; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):214-21. PubMed ID: 19647705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Contribution of the genetic fingerprintings compared to grouping ABO/Rhesus technique in the expertise of filiation].
Souiden Y; Chaieb K; Romdhani M; Mahdouani K
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(6):663-70. PubMed ID: 18039613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
