These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9412285)

  • 1. Lessons from the mammography screening controversy: can we improve the debate?
    Ransohoff DF; Harris RP
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):1029-34. PubMed ID: 9412285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues.
    Smith RA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2000; 50(5):312-36. PubMed ID: 11075240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making.
    Ernster VL
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography in Mexico Through a Simulation.
    Ulloa-Pérez E; Mohar-Betancourt A; Reynoso-Noverón N
    Rev Invest Clin; 2016; 68(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 27623037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Mandelblatt J; Saha S; Teutsch S; Hoerger T; Siu AL; Atkins D; Klein J; Helfand M;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):835-42. PubMed ID: 14623621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening for breast cancer: the time of decision].
    Gordenne W
    J Belge Radiol; 1998 Apr; 81(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9640877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of mammography in women older than 65 years of age.
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):I34. PubMed ID: 14623641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
    Pace LE; Keating NL
    JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.
    Black WC; Nease RF; Tosteson AN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(10):720-31. PubMed ID: 7563149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of the radiologist in mammography screening.
    Strax P
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1675-7. PubMed ID: 3651992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jul; 89(14):1015-26. PubMed ID: 9230883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Carles M; Martínez-Alonso M; Pons A; Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Perestelo-Pérez L; Sala M; Vidal C; Garcia M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Codern N; Feijoo-Cid M; Romero A; Pla R; Soler-González J; Castells X; Rué M;
    Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):426. PubMed ID: 28899412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Salzmann P; Kerlikowske K; Phillips K
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):955-65. PubMed ID: 9412300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammography and public health policy: the need for perspective.
    Wright CJ; Mueller CB
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8966):29-32. PubMed ID: 7603143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening: prospects and opportunity costs.
    Navarro AM; Kaplan RM
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):209-33. PubMed ID: 9421557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberto A; Colombo C; Candiani G; Giordano L; Mantellini P; Paci E; Satolli R; Valenza M; Mosconi P
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(1):429. PubMed ID: 28629329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of universal screening mammography. Lessons from a community intervention.
    Costanza ME; D'Orsi CJ; Greene HL; Gaw VP; Karellas A; Zapka JG
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 151(9):1851-6. PubMed ID: 1888252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography screening under 50: a limited perspective on a multifaceted issue.
    Royak-Schaler R; Gallant SJ; Klabunde CN
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):243-9; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.