These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9413871)

  • 1. In vitro estimation of foetal liver volume using ultrasound, x-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hughes SW; D'Arcy TJ; Maxwell DJ; Saunders JE
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 9413871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volume estimation from multiplanar 2D ultrasound images using a remote electromagnetic position and orientation sensor.
    Hughes SW; D'Arcy TJ; Maxwell DJ; Chiu W; Milner A; Saunders JE; Sheppard RJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 8865553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a new discreet form of Gauss' theorem for measuring volume.
    Hughes SW; D'Arcy TJ; Maxwell DJ; Saunders JE; Ruff CF; Chiu WS; Sheppard RJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1809-21. PubMed ID: 8884913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of a new system for estimating organ volume using ultrasound.
    Hughes SW; D'Arcy TJ; Maxwell DJ; Saunders JE; Chinn S; Sheppard RJ
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Feb; 18(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 9046539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact CT-based liver volume calculation including nonmetabolic liver tissue in three-dimensional liver reconstruction.
    Müller SA; Bläuer K; Kremer M; Thorn M; Mehrabi A; Meinzer HP; Hinz U; Metzger J; Büchler MW; Schmied BM
    J Surg Res; 2010 May; 160(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 19765736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Liver volume measurement by spiral CT: an in vitro study.
    Kayaalp C; Arda K; Oto A; Oran M
    Clin Imaging; 2002; 26(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 11852220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the optimum section thickness for the estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance images: a stereological gold standard study.
    Sahin B; Ergur H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 16112829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards integrating functional imaging in the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation: the registration of the MR spectroscopy imaging to ultrasound/CT images and its implementation in treatment planning.
    Mizowaki T; Cohen GN; Fung AY; Zaider M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Dec; 54(5):1558-64. PubMed ID: 12459385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of liver volume by ultrasound and computed tomography.
    Fritschy P; Robotti G; Schneekloth G; Vock P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1983 Aug; 11(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 6413535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semiautomated thyroid volumetry using 3D CT: prospective comparison with measurements obtained using 2D ultrasound, 2D CT, and water displacement method of specimen.
    Lee SJ; Chong S; Kang KH; Hur J; Hong BW; Kim HJ; Kim SJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W525-32. PubMed ID: 25341167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective staging of fibrosis by the selected texture features of liver: Which one is better, CT or MR imaging?
    Zhang X; Gao X; Liu BJ; Ma K; Yan W; Liling L; Yuhong H; Fujita H
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():227-36. PubMed ID: 26455963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Registration of MR and CT images of the liver: comparison of voxel similarity and surface based registration algorithms.
    Christina Lee WC; Tublin ME; Chapman BE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 May; 78(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 15848266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Position tracking of moving liver lesion based on real-time registration between 2D ultrasound and 3D preoperative images.
    Weon C; Hyun Nam W; Lee D; Lee JY; Ra JB
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):335-47. PubMed ID: 25563273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of section thickness on the estimation of liver volume by the Cavalieri principle using computed tomography images.
    Emirzeoglu M; Sahin B; Selcuk MB; Kaplan S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 15893441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of volume measurement using helical CT.
    Nawaratne S; Fabiny R; Brien JE; Zalcberg J; Cosolo W; Whan A; Morgan DJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 9135663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of liver volume using spiral CT and the curved line and cubic spline algorithms: reproducibility and interobserver variation.
    Sandrasegaran K; Kwo PW; DiGirolamo D; Stockberger SM; Cummings OW; Kopecky KK
    Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9933675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of feline renal volume using computed tomography and ultrasound.
    Tyson R; Logsdon SA; Werre SR; Daniel GB
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 23278991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of volume calculation formulae on volume estimation accuracy of different shaped objects: an in vitro ultrasound and CT study.
    Kodikara I; Gamage D; Abeysekara I; Ilayperuma I
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 32013542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transrectal ultrasound based prostate volume determination: is the frustum algorithm more accurate than planimetry?
    Liu D; Usmani N; Sloboda RS
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031705. PubMed ID: 23464300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate CT∕MR vessel-guided nonrigid registration of largely deformed livers.
    Vasquez Osorio EM; Hoogeman MS; Mendez Romero A; Wielopolski P; Zolnay A; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2463-77. PubMed ID: 22559617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.