These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9413909)

  • 1. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC).
    Berg NG; Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(4):121-7. PubMed ID: 9413909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance.
    Siervo S; Pampalone A; Siervo P; Siervo R
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays.
    Posselt A; Kerschbaum T
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14601187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 9855855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative measurement of marginal disintegration of ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsubakimoto Y; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14753325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective study of Mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years.
    Schulz P; Johansson A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 14651236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
    Denissen H; Dozić A; van der Zel J; van Waas M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Inlays made from the glass ceramic Bioverit II. A clinical and scanning electron microscopic study].
    Glockmann E; Paschka S; Paschka J; Carl G; Schelle D
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1992; 80(7-8):408-11. PubMed ID: 1304816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.