BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9414155)

  • 1. Researcher sues over 'fraud' sanction.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1997 Dec 18-25; 390(6661):652. PubMed ID: 9414155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cheating in science and publishing.
    Altman LK
    CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences.
    Davis RD
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
    University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
    Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nazi data on hypothermia termed unscientific.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1990 May; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11646755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heat rises over UCSD 'misconduct' charge.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6617):566. PubMed ID: 9024644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
    Cooper-Mahkorn D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. University forced to pay $1.6 million to researcher.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Aug; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
    Swan N
    New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prostate researcher tested firm's product -- and sat on its board.
    Burton TM
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1998 Mar; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11648093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allocating credit and blame in science.
    Chubin DE
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
    Kochan CA; Budd JM
    J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different lessons from the Darsee affair?
    Tynan M; Anderson RH
    Int J Cardiol; 1984; 5(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biologist in fraud investigation.
    New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1360):609. PubMed ID: 11655541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biologist 'has admitted fraud.
    New Sci; 1983 Jul; 99(1365):5. PubMed ID: 11655539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.