These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9414340)

  • 1. A neural network-based system for classification of industrial jobs with respect to risk of low back disorders due to workplace design.
    Zurada J; Karwowski W; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Feb; 28(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 9414340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of discriminant analysis-based model for prediction of risk of low back disorders due to workplace design in industrial jobs.
    Ganga GM; Esposto KF; Braatz D
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2370-6. PubMed ID: 22317070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury.
    Marras WS; Lavender SA; Leurgans SE; Rajulu SL; Allread WG; Fathallah FA; Ferguson SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Apr; 18(5):617-28. PubMed ID: 8484154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidemiology of low-back pain in industry.
    Garg A; Moore JS
    Occup Med; 1992; 7(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 1411850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low back problems and possible improvements in nursing jobs.
    Vieira ER; Kumar S; Coury HJ; Narayan Y
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 16768742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low back disorders in agriculture and the role of stooped work: scope, potential interventions, and research needs.
    Fathallah FA; Miller BJ; Miles JA
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Apr; 14(2):221-45. PubMed ID: 18524286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
    Waters TR; Baron SL; Piacitelli LA; Anderson VP; Skov T; Haring-Sweeney M; Wall DK; Fine LJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):386-94; discussion 395. PubMed ID: 10065524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing physical exposure-based back injury risk models applicable to manual handling jobs in distribution centers.
    Lavender SA; Marras WS; Ferguson SA; Splittstoesser RE; Yang G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(7):450-9. PubMed ID: 22667996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction Effects of Personal, Psychosocial, and Occupational Risk Factors on Low Back Pain Severity Using Artificial Neural Networks Approach in Industrial Workers.
    Darvishi E; Khotanlou H; Khoubi J; Giahi O; Mahdavi N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2017 Sep; 40(7):486-493. PubMed ID: 28739018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of five methods used to determine low back disorder risk in a manufacturing environment.
    Lavender SA; Oleske DM; Nicholson L; Andersson GB; Hahn J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jul; 24(14):1441-8. PubMed ID: 10423789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective validation of a low-back disorder risk model and assessment of ergonomic interventions associated with manual materials handling tasks.
    Marras WS; Allread WG; Burr DL; Fathallah FA
    Ergonomics; 2000 Nov; 43(11):1866-86. PubMed ID: 11105977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 1: A review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with low-back pain.
    Keyserling WM
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 10772613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new approach to applying feedforward neural networks to the prediction of musculoskeletal disorder risk.
    Chen CL; Kaber DB; Dempsey PG
    Appl Ergon; 2000 Jun; 31(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 10855450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevention of low back pain: basic ergonomics in the workplace and the clinic.
    Halpern M
    Baillieres Clin Rheumatol; 1992 Oct; 6(3):705-30. PubMed ID: 1477898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [LOW BACK PAIN AT NEW WORKING AMBIENT IN ERA OF NEW ECONOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ABOUT OCCUPATIONAL RISK FACTORS].
    Pranjić N; Maleš-Bilić L
    Acta Med Croatica; 2015 Mar; 69(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 26606785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain: a multidimensional analysis.
    Pransky G; Benjamin K; Hill-Fotouhi C; Fletcher KE; Himmelstein J; Katz JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):864-70. PubMed ID: 11935111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study on musculoskeletal disorders in a machinery manufacturing plant.
    Xiao GB; Dempsey PG; Lei L; Ma ZH; Liang YX
    J Occup Environ Med; 2004 Apr; 46(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 15076652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.