BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9415734)

  • 1. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types.
    Wolfe V; Fitch J; Martin D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):292-9. PubMed ID: 9415734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity.
    Martin D; Fitch J; Wolfe V
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 7474970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity.
    Wolfe V; Martin D
    J Commun Disord; 1997; 30(5):403-15; quiz 415-6. PubMed ID: 9309531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic prediction of severity in commonly occurring voice problems.
    Wolfe V; Fitch J; Cornell R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 38(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 7596093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types.
    Wolfe VI; Steinfatt TM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Jun; 30(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 3599955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Heuer RJ; Michael DD; Ostrowski R; Horman M; Baroody MM; Hillenbrand J; Sataloff RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2003 Apr; 112(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 12731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; López P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 12697983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    J Voice; 2006 Sep; 20(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 16185841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.
    Wolfe V; Cornell R; Palmer C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 2072674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia.
    Awan SN; Roy N
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):268-82. PubMed ID: 15907441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.