BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9415734)

  • 21. Effects of perceptual training based upon synthesized voice signals.
    Martin DP; Wolfe VI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 2):1291-8. PubMed ID: 9017742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2217-24. PubMed ID: 14587619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An acoustic-perceptual study of vocal tremor.
    Anand S; Shrivastav R; Wingate JM; Chheda NN
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):811.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22921293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-Reported Voice Disorders Among Female Teachers.
    Lin FC; Chen SH; Chen SC; Wang CT; Kuo YC
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 26096986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3014-21. PubMed ID: 12509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Michael DD; Goding GS
    J Voice; 2002 Mar; 16(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 12008652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Timing of Voice Therapy: A Primary Investigation of Voice Outcomes for Surgical Benign Vocal Fold Lesion Patients.
    Tang SS; Thibeault SL
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):129.e1-129.e7. PubMed ID: 26776951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discrimination of five voice qualities and prediction to perceptual ratings.
    Pittam J
    Phonetica; 1987; 44(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 3588690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality.
    Carding PN; Steen IN; Webb A; MacKenzie K; Deary IJ; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Oct; 29(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15373870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic and perceptual measurements of roughness influencing judgments of pitch.
    Wolfe VI; Ratusnik DL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3339863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical voice analysis of Carnatic singers.
    Arunachalam R; Boominathan P; Mahalingam S
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):128.e1-128.e9. PubMed ID: 24275462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustic fidelity of internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders.
    Xue SA; Lower A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1366-76. PubMed ID: 20815471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.