BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9415786)

  • 1. Pap smear outreach: a randomized controlled trial in an HMO.
    Binstock MA; Geiger AM; Hackett JR; Yao JF
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(6):425-6. PubMed ID: 9415786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services.
    Lynch FL; Whitlock EP; Valanis BG; Smith SK
    Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 38(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 15020173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of Massachusetts HMOs in providing Pap smear and sexually transmitted disease screening to adolescent females.
    Thrall JS; McCloskey L; Spivak H; Ettner SL; Tighe JE; Emans SJ
    J Adolesc Health; 1998 Mar; 22(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 9502004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Papanicolaou testing among Vietnamese Americans: results of a multifaceted intervention.
    Nguyen TT; McPhee SJ; Gildengorin G; Nguyen T; Wong C; Lai KQ; Lam H; Mock J; Luong TN; Bui-Tong N; Ha-Iaconis T
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Jul; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16777536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taiwan's national health insurance system and the application of preventive care: the case of Pap smear testing.
    Lin YJ; Chen CS; Liu TC; Lin HC
    Public Health; 2008 Sep; 122(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 18617202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a community outreach service with opportunity screening for cervical cancer using Pap smears.
    Chang HC; Hsiung HY; Chen SI; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Jun; 29(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 17389674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Harvard HMO improves Pap smear screening.
    Herman R
    QA Rev; 1989 Oct; 1(3):2-3. PubMed ID: 10318359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promotion of cervical screening among nonattendees: a partial cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE; Carlsson PG
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 18090130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pap screening in a U.S. health plan.
    Insinga RP; Glass AG; Rush BB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 15006908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
    Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for cervical cancer: will women accept less?
    Sirovich BE; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    Am J Med; 2005 Feb; 118(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 15694900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An open-label randomized trial to determine the most effective regimen of vaginal estrogen to reduce the prevalence of atrophic changes reported in postmenopausal cervical smears.
    Bateson DJ; Weisberg E
    Menopause; 2009; 16(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 19407678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical inquiries. Should we discontinue Pap smear screening in women aged>65 years?
    Curran DR; Stigleman S; Neher JO
    J Fam Pract; 2004 Apr; 53(4):308-10. PubMed ID: 15068776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
    Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
    Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
    Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Pap smear: a victim of its own success?
    Steigman CK; Vernick JP
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):8-14; quiz 14-5. PubMed ID: 12228932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More Mother's Days.
    Zablocki E
    Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10176848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.
    Kulasingam SL; Myers ER; Lawson HW; McConnell KJ; Kerlikowske K; Melnikow J; Washington AE; Sawaya GF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 16449119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing women's participation in Pap smear screening in Australia--how can we tell if the national policy is effective?
    Shelley J; Street A
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 10119050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
    Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.