These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9416410)
1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms. Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct]. Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP. Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)]. Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2002 Jan 14-16; 19(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 14768653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors]. Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Sica GT; Braver J; Cooney MJ; Miller FH; Chai JL; Adams DF Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 10207456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct. Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitfalls of MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Kamisawa T; Okamoto T JOP; 2004 Nov; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 15536287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation. Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Hünerbein M; Stroszczynski C; Ulmer C; Handke T; Felix R; Schlag PM Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Dec; 58(6):853-8. PubMed ID: 14652552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts]. Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]