233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9416410)
1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M
Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.
Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.
NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2002 Jan 14-16; 19(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 14768653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
Sica GT; Braver J; Cooney MJ; Miller FH; Chai JL; Adams DF
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 10207456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitfalls of MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction.
Kamisawa T; Okamoto T
JOP; 2004 Nov; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 15536287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.
Hünerbein M; Stroszczynski C; Ulmer C; Handke T; Felix R; Schlag PM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Dec; 58(6):853-8. PubMed ID: 14652552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts].
Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
