BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9416447)

  • 1. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Ohlrich B; Hoover B; Redner J; Peters J
    Ear Hear; 1997 Dec; 18(6):440-55. PubMed ID: 9416447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Bergman B; Beauchaine KL; Kaminski JR; Peters J; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2050-60. PubMed ID: 8473617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses.
    Dorn PA; Piskorski P; Gorga MP; Neely ST; Keefe DH
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 10229516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance.
    Go NA; Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 29952805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
    Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Dierking DM; Tan H; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.
    Ellison JC; Keefe DH
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):487-503. PubMed ID: 16230898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission response characteristics in older adults.
    Torre P; Cruickshanks KJ; Nondahl DM; Wiley TL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12598810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss.
    Hussain DM; Gorga MP; Neely ST; Keefe DH; Peters J
    Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):434-49. PubMed ID: 9867292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired ears.
    Probst R; Hauser R
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990; 11(4):236-43. PubMed ID: 2240411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears.
    Stover LJ; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2669-78. PubMed ID: 10573884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for the assessment of auditory sensitivity].
    Chida E
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1998 Nov; 101(11):1335-47. PubMed ID: 9867000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.