These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9416450)

  • 1. Effects of formant bandwidth on the identification of synthetic vowels by cochlear implant recipients.
    Hawks JW; Fourakis MS; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Holden LK
    Ear Hear; 1997 Dec; 18(6):479-87. PubMed ID: 9416450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):443-60. PubMed ID: 10613383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 12195176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of cochlear implantation on vowel articulation.
    Hocevar-Boltezar I; Boltezar M; Zargi M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2008; 120(7-8):228-33. PubMed ID: 18500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability of memory traces for speech sounds in cochlear implant patients.
    Salo S; Peltola MS; Aaltonen O; Johansson R; Lang AH; Laurikainen E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2002; 27(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 12498354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of vocalic information in the identification of /s/ and /sh/ by children with cochlear implants.
    Summerfield AQ; Nakisa MJ; Mccormick B; Archbold S; Gibbin KP; Odonoghue GM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 11881918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vowel perception strategies of normal-hearing subjects and patients using Nucleus multichannel and 3M/House cochlear implants.
    Tartter VC; Hellman SA; Chute PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1269-83. PubMed ID: 1401515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dawson PW; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Dec; 18(6):488-501. PubMed ID: 9416451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor.
    Fishman KE; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1201-15. PubMed ID: 9328890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.
    Harnsberger JD; Svirsky MA; Kaiser AR; Pisoni DB; Wright R; Meyer TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2135-45. PubMed ID: 11386565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.