These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9416638)

  • 1. Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets.
    Humphrey DG; Kramer AF
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Dec; 12(4):704-17. PubMed ID: 9416638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature head-start: Conjunction search following progressive feature disclosure.
    Olds ES; Graham TJ; Jones JA
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1428-47. PubMed ID: 19236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task.
    Baluch F; Itti L
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9127. PubMed ID: 20174622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
    Wolfe JM; Cave KR; Franzel SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 2527952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using feature preview to investigate the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing in conjunction search.
    Sobel KV; Pickard MD; Acklin WT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 19577222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining local and global limitations of visual search.
    Põder E
    J Vis; 2017 Apr; 17(4):10. PubMed ID: 28448660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search for conjunctions of physical and numerical size shows that they are processed independently.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM; Faulkenberry TJ; Dague TD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):444-453. PubMed ID: 27893271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible cue combination in the guidance of attention in visual search.
    Brand J; Oriet C; Johnson AP; Wolfe JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():129-38. PubMed ID: 25463553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging and filtering by movement in visual search.
    Kramer AF; Martin-Emerson R; Larish JF; Andersen GJ
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 1996 Jul; 51(4):P201-16. PubMed ID: 8673641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding occurs at early stages of processing in children and adults.
    Theunissen EL; Alain C; Chevalier H; Taylor MJ
    Neuroreport; 2001 Jul; 12(9):1949-54. PubMed ID: 11435928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.
    Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Chetverikov A; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104032. PubMed ID: 31476612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guided search for triple conjunctions.
    Nordfang M; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1535-59. PubMed ID: 25005070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct mechanisms account for the linear non-separability and conjunction effects in visual shape encoding.
    Saumier D; Arguin M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1373-88. PubMed ID: 14578090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.
    Carrasco M; Yeshurun Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):673-92. PubMed ID: 9554103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binding visual features during high-rate serial presentation.
    Cortese F; Bernstein LJ; Alain C
    Neuroreport; 1999 May; 10(7):1565-70. PubMed ID: 10380982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative and qualitative differences in the top-down guiding attributes of visual search.
    Hulleman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):942-964. PubMed ID: 32378936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.