89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9417520)
1. [Candida identification: experiences with the Vitek automated system].
Schulz K; Bernhardt H; Schröder G
Mycoses; 1997; 40 Suppl 1():86-90. PubMed ID: 9417520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of chromogenic agar, [corrected] VITEK2 YST and VITEK® MS for identification of Candida strains isolated from blood cultures.
Sariguzel FM; Berk E; Koc AN; Sav H; Aydemir G
Infez Med; 2015 Dec; 23(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 26700081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of Candida auris by Use of the Updated Vitek 2 Yeast Identification System, Version 8.01: a Multilaboratory Evaluation Study.
Ambaraghassi G; Dufresne PJ; Dufresne SF; Vallières É; Muñoz JF; Cuomo CA; Berkow EL; Lockhart SR; Luong ML
J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 31413079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the rapid yeast plus panel with the API20C yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of Candida species.
Heelan JS; Sotomayor E; Coon K; D'Arezzo JB
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1443-5. PubMed ID: 9574727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of different yeasts isolates among trauma patients and comparison of accuracy in identification of yeasts by automated method versus conventional methods for better use in low resource countries.
Rajkumari N; Mathur P; Xess I; Misra MC
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2014; 32(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 25297023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms.
Graf B; Adam T; Zill E; Göbel UB
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 May; 38(5):1782-5. PubMed ID: 10790099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of Vitek 2 for the identification of Candida yeasts].
Ochiuzzi ME; Cataldi S; Guelfand L; Maldonado I; Arechavala A;
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2014; 46(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 25011593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card with conventional methods for speciation of Candida.
Sood P; Mishra B; Dogra V; Mandal A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 43(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 11217271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Useful phenotypic characteristics for presumptive identification of Candida guilliermondii].
Pinoni MV; Castán V; Maegli MI; Lorenzo J; Frizzera F; Jewtuchowicz V; Mujica MT
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2007; 39(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 17702251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry vs conventional methods in the identification of Candida non-albicans].
Martínez-Lamas L; Pérez del Molino ML; Pardo F; Varela E; Regueiro BJ
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2011 Oct; 29(8):568-72. PubMed ID: 21782293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for Routine Identification of Candida Species in a Resource-Poor Setting.
Sow D; Fall B; Ndiaye M; Ba BS; Sylla K; Tine R; Lô AC; Abiola A; Wade B; Dieng T; Dieng Y; Ndiaye JL; Hennequin C; Gaye O; Faye B
Mycopathologia; 2015 Oct; 180(3-4):173-9. PubMed ID: 26016846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of methods for the identification of the most common yeasts in the clinical microbiology laboratory].
Guelfand L; Grisolía P; Bozzano C; Kaufman S
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12833681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors accounting for misidentification of Candida species.
Lo HJ; Ho YA; Ho M
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2001 Sep; 34(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 11605807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hichrom candida agar for identification of Candida species.
Baradkar VP; Mathur M; Kumar S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 20090231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular identification and distribution profile of Candida species isolated from Iranian patients.
Mohammadi R; Mirhendi H; Rezaei-Matehkolaei A; Ghahri M; Shidfar MR; Jalalizand N; Makimura K
Med Mycol; 2013 Aug; 51(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 23470036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
