132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9418634)
21. Comparison of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a matched pair analysis.
Geiger F; Mau H; Krüger M; Thomsen M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Mar; 128(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 18175131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of American and Japanese cohorts.
Iorio R; Kobayashi S; Healy WL; Cruz AI; Ayers ME
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2007; 16(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 18053397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty].
Kucera T; Urban K; Karpas K; Sponer P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Oct; 74(5):326-31. PubMed ID: 18001629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Walking ability following knee arthroplasty: a prospective pilot study of factors affecting the maximal walking distance in 18 patients before and 6 months after total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberg N; Nierenberg G; Lenger R; Soudry M
Knee; 2007 Dec; 14(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 17766122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Apollo total knee replacements in University Malaya Medical Centre: a short-term outcome.
Abbas AA; Merican AM; Kwan MK; Mohamad JA
Med J Malaysia; 2006 Feb; 61 Suppl A():83-7. PubMed ID: 17042237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement.
Roos EM; Toksvig-Larsen S
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 May; 1():17. PubMed ID: 12801417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Scorpio posterior-stabilized knee system: 5-year clinical and functional results.
Kolisek FR; Barnes CL
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1187-92. PubMed ID: 17162180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient expectations of total knee replacement and their association with sociodemographic factors and functional status.
Yoo JH; Chang CB; Kang YG; Kim SJ; Seong SC; Kim TK
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 21357955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does the Oxford Knee Score complement, concur, or contradict the American Knee Society Score?
Reddy KI; Johnston LR; Wang W; Abboud RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 20817390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictors of functional ambulation and patient perception following total knee replacement and short-term rehabilitation.
Crosbie J; Naylor J; Harmer A; Russell T
Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 32(13):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19860602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty: the impact of patient-relevant factors on self-reported function and quality of life.
Kauppila AM; Kyllönen E; Ohtonen P; Leppilahti J; Sintonen H; Arokoski JP
Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(17-18):1659-67. PubMed ID: 21184628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional Outcomes in High-function-demand patients after total knee arthroplasty.
Lozano Calderón SA; Shen J; Doumato DF; Zelicof S
Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e681-90. PubMed ID: 22588410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of the expectations of elderly patients before undergoing total knee replacement.
Muniesa JM; Marco E; Tejero M; Boza R; Duarte E; Escalada F; Cáceres E
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2010; 51(3):e83-7. PubMed ID: 20116111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of walking before and after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A comparison of different methods.
Mattsson E; Olsson E; Broström LA
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1990; 22(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 2326609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Noise, numbness, and kneeling difficulties after total knee arthroplasty: is the outcome affected?
Sharkey PF; Miller AJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1427-31. PubMed ID: 21256704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors that impact expectations before total knee arthroplasty.
Hepinstall MS; Rutledge JR; Bornstein LJ; Mazumdar M; Westrich GH
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):870-6. PubMed ID: 21074356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Outcomes research in total joint replacement: a critical review and commentary.
Patt JC; Mauerhan DR
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2005 Apr; 34(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 15913169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of knee ligament scores and rating systems].
Peters G; Wirth CJ; Kohn D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9199076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Deehan DJ; Lees D; Jameson S; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1058-66. PubMed ID: 22844046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Functional evaluation of patients fitted with total knee prostheses.
Giannini S; Gandolfi M; Marcacci M; Catani F; Ceccarelli F; Paladini Molgora A
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1992; 18(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 1345643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
