These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9419529)

  • 1. The pertinence of research on visual search to radiologic practice.
    Wolfe JM
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9419529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks.
    Wolfe JM; Friedman-Hill SR; Bilsky AB
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):537-50. PubMed ID: 8008555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset.
    Friedman-Hill S; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):531-51. PubMed ID: 7790832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity effects in visual search predicted from the group scanning model.
    Macquistan AD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Dec; 48(4):495-515. PubMed ID: 7866391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?
    Shih SI; Sperling G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):758-79. PubMed ID: 8666962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction time drifts identify objects of attention in pigeon visual search.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Apr; 19(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 8505592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.
    Bravo MJ; Nakayama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 1594436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.
    Hodsoll J; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):918-26. PubMed ID: 11521856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Underestimating numerosity of items in visual search tasks.
    Cassenti DN; Kelley TD; Ghirardelli TG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 21162441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.
    Huang L; Holcombe AO; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 15078040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality.
    Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):640-60. PubMed ID: 12075894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.
    McConkie GW; Currie CB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):563-81. PubMed ID: 8666953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
    Wolfe JM; Cave KR; Franzel SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 2527952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.
    Johnston JC; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues.
    Gottlob LR
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.