These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9419659)

  • 1. Degeneracy and discrete receiver operating characteristic rating data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Oct; 2(10):907-15. PubMed ID: 9419659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
    Pan X; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE; Lenth RV; Hanley JA; Abu Dagga H
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Feb; 4(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 9061087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonparametric estimation of degenerate ROC data sets used for comparison of imaging systems.
    Rockette HE; Obuchowski NA; Gur D
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jul; 25(7):835-7. PubMed ID: 2391200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the generalization of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method: an assessment.
    Rockette HE; Gur D; Kurs-Lasky M; King JL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 9419527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.
    Metz CE; Herman BA; Shen JH
    Stat Med; 1998 May; 17(9):1033-53. PubMed ID: 9612889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Lenth RV; Chen YF; Donaghy BA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):591-602. PubMed ID: 9750888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
    Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.
    Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 2770630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings.
    Verdonschot EH; Wenzel A; Bronkhorst EM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 8222599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.
    Pesce LL; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):814-29. PubMed ID: 17574132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
    Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.